Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Felon" data-source="post: 897707" data-attributes="member: 8158">Feh, says who? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> Dragons do whatever they want, including stuff that other dragons don't do.  Simply put: results speak for themselves. What, dragons are too proud to be pragmatic? It's tough to argue that things that make you more effective actually lessen you.Sure? Why "sure" that and "no way" other stuff?Because they also enhance the dragon. Natural armor bonuses stack with regular armor bonues, and the weapons allow the dragon to dish out even more carnage.Yet they'd still be more maneuverable than most of their puny foes.  And if they're opting to go toe-to-toe, then maneuverability comes second to defense.LOL, how do they fly without the armor? It lacks cookie-cutter compatability, if that's what you mean.I may or may not have use for anything in that article--I saw the tail-sword and immediately thought "heh, I bet he's overcompensating for something"--but I sure don't see the point of slamming it just because the authors aren't too hidebound by preconceptions to breathe some new life into a classic monster.</blockquote>