Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- individual adventure modules! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed to plug in to your game.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Dragon/Dungeon Submissions?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shemeska" data-source="post: 4766797" data-attributes="member: 11697"><p>Thanks for looking into things Scott, it's very much appreciated.</p><p></p><p>Fairly or not, the fact that there has been a rather limited pool of contributors to e-Dragon and e-Dungeon, and not even a form rejection letter is sent if a given query isn't of interest, it leads to the perception that the entire thing is the equivalent of a closed shop, and that if you're not in-house or one of the freelancers who started working early on 4e material, your submissions won't be given a second glance.</p><p></p><p>Given that in the past, the print versions of Dragon and Dungeon gave responses to queries, and currently KQ manages to respond to queries, even if it happens to be a rejection, doesn't help that perception.</p><p></p><p>In my case, I had one thing that's a bit different from the situations mentioned above, because I was asked to forward something already written and was told that I would get a response once they read it over, and then I never did, nor did my followup emails receive any response as well. That's not encouraging to say the very least.</p><p></p><p>At the moment the entire process seems like a black box with zero feedback to interested potential authors. I have to wonder if it's only enforcing and exacerbating the situation where you guys say you aren't getting queries that you're interested in, because folks are taking their ideas elsewhere that doesn't seem closed off and non-responsive. People used to talk all over the Paizo boards about queries they had submitted and had rejected, or discussion between folks waiting for feedback on queries or on submitted manuscripts. I haven't seen a single thread doing the same over on the WotC forums within the e-zines subforums - not a single one. I have seen multiple threads asking if you're even taking submissions/looking at queries, and most of those fade after a few people wander by and post that they don't know, or haven't heard anything but silence on their own, etc.</p><p></p><p>So please, please improve communication in that area, because I think you're doing yourself a disservice and probably alienating folks who want to submit material. The 'assume after 60 days of dead silence that we're not interested' approach is probably the wrong one to take.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shemeska, post: 4766797, member: 11697"] Thanks for looking into things Scott, it's very much appreciated. Fairly or not, the fact that there has been a rather limited pool of contributors to e-Dragon and e-Dungeon, and not even a form rejection letter is sent if a given query isn't of interest, it leads to the perception that the entire thing is the equivalent of a closed shop, and that if you're not in-house or one of the freelancers who started working early on 4e material, your submissions won't be given a second glance. Given that in the past, the print versions of Dragon and Dungeon gave responses to queries, and currently KQ manages to respond to queries, even if it happens to be a rejection, doesn't help that perception. In my case, I had one thing that's a bit different from the situations mentioned above, because I was asked to forward something already written and was told that I would get a response once they read it over, and then I never did, nor did my followup emails receive any response as well. That's not encouraging to say the very least. At the moment the entire process seems like a black box with zero feedback to interested potential authors. I have to wonder if it's only enforcing and exacerbating the situation where you guys say you aren't getting queries that you're interested in, because folks are taking their ideas elsewhere that doesn't seem closed off and non-responsive. People used to talk all over the Paizo boards about queries they had submitted and had rejected, or discussion between folks waiting for feedback on queries or on submitted manuscripts. I haven't seen a single thread doing the same over on the WotC forums within the e-zines subforums - not a single one. I have seen multiple threads asking if you're even taking submissions/looking at queries, and most of those fade after a few people wander by and post that they don't know, or haven't heard anything but silence on their own, etc. So please, please improve communication in that area, because I think you're doing yourself a disservice and probably alienating folks who want to submit material. The 'assume after 60 days of dead silence that we're not interested' approach is probably the wrong one to take. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Dragon/Dungeon Submissions?
Top