Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ralif Redhammer" data-source="post: 7832423" data-attributes="member: 30438">Oh, don't get me wrong, I dig the following one - that one barely changed in the decades to follow, and is for me the definitive Dragon logo. But that earlier one feels very much like a product of its time, and I dig it.I wouldn't say that I didn't like the column, but I've found them of limited utility. For me, the fictional/folklore character adaptations to D&D are a mixed bag. Sometimes they're interesting, but other times it requires such contortions to get close to the right feel. Even Fafhrd and Grey Mouser, two of the most influential characters on D&D, are generally written up as having at least three character classes to make them work. And far later, with the Song of Ice and Fire issue of Dragon they really had to struggle to shoehorn those characters into 3e terms.</blockquote>