Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Whizbang Dustyboots" data-source="post: 9434068" data-attributes="member: 11760">I love this era of Dragon covers, when there was no direction to make anything look like D&amp;D standard critters, but just &quot;we're buying cool fantasy paintings.&quot; I think all of these magazines (including White Dwarf) lost something when they became solely focused on their company's games. (Dragon+ by the end was especially grim in that regard.)Psionics never did anything for me, but Citadel by the Sea was a great straightforward adventure. It's a shame the rights issues of these articles are such a mess, because this would be a nice adventure to see get a higher profile.And I blame this issue for unleashing years of &quot;well, you can't bring your dice to the table unless you've thoroughly tested them&quot; that some weirdos insisted on into the 1990s. (Don't play with those weirdos, folks. It really doesn't matter that much if a number comes up 3% of the time too often.)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Whizbang Dustyboots, post: 9434068, member: 11760"] I love this era of Dragon covers, when there was no direction to make anything look like D&D standard critters, but just "we're buying cool fantasy paintings." I think all of these magazines (including White Dwarf) lost something when they became solely focused on their company's games. (Dragon+ by the end was especially grim in that regard.) Psionics never did anything for me, but Citadel by the Sea was a great straightforward adventure. It's a shame the rights issues of these articles are such a mess, because this would be a nice adventure to see get a higher profile. And I blame this issue for unleashing years of "well, you can't bring your dice to the table unless you've thoroughly tested them" that some weirdos insisted on into the 1990s. (Don't play with those weirdos, folks. It really doesn't matter that much if a number comes up 3% of the time too often.) [/QUOTE]

Verification