Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Dragonborn inter-species breeding?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bacon Bits" data-source="post: 6594463" data-attributes="member: 6777737"><p>I thought of another one which pretty much every DM tries at some point, particularly if there are Lawful Good party members, especially if you're playing in 3e or earlier, and doubly so if there's a Paladin in the group. Few people try it more than once, because the situation is pretty <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> for the players, and if handled poorly can end a campaign. I was reminded by this exchange from earlier:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>See, because killing and murder are a part of the game all the time, and we never think twice about it because its always monsters. Except for one situation....</p><p></p><p>Orc babies.</p><p></p><p>You know the trope. You're clearing a dungeon, and your party comes across den of orcs. You clear them out. You get to the last room, where you find a group of cowering orc women and children. They're clearly non-combatants, and because of the morality system of the game they're in a Schrodinger's box where they're simultaneously irredeemably evil and purely innocent, you don't know if you should kill them or let them live. Now the players are forced with three choices: a) kill ostensibly innocent humanoids, b) release creatures who will inevitably be evil and hostile when grown, and c) arrest everybody and give them to some legal or divine authority to sort out.</p><p></p><p>DMs seem to like to add this scenario because it adds depth. The problem is, it doesn't. At best it deadlocks the game while the players argue. At worst, the party stops adventuring to play prison escort. The whole scenario is interesting to roleplay for about 5 minutes, and it inevitably takes far longer.</p><p></p><p>See, the scenario requires a type of morality that the D&D game world <em>doesn't have</em>. The game often says there are irredeemably evil creatures, and racial enmities which reach all the way to <em>deities</em>. The real problem with the scenario is that the solution to this problem would be in Paladin Training 101. Every <em>character</em> in the game world knows exactly what needs to be done in this situation, but <em>the players</em> often won't. The <em>characters</em> know the law. The <em>characters</em> know church doctrine. Worst case scenario, the players have their god on speed dial and can ask him or her what they should do. This situation should be a <em>settled matter of doctrine</em>. The <em>players</em> have no idea, however, because <em>they weren't raised in the game world</em> and don't know what to do. They're screwed because the DM can punish you no matter what you do by changing the way the world works after the fact. It was especially bad when you were a 1e-3e Paladin with a code of conduct. Now a character is faced with a no-win situation that <em>cripples his character</em>. It's injecting our shaded morality which relies on the fact that <em>everything</em> is subjective into a world where morality is <em>often objective</em> because you can directly ask a true moral authority when you have questions. In D&D, morality walks on two legs and performs miracles for creatures that worship it. It's not like we can call up Jesus of Nazareth or Siddhartha Gautama or Muhammad or Hades or Odin or Horus or Quetzalcoatl and ask how to handle no-win sitations. D&D characters <em>can</em>. Often <em>literally</em>.</p><p></p><p>"But the Kobayashi Maru is a great test of character that requires you to expand beyond yourself and redefine your character!"</p><p></p><p>F*** you, DM. My character should already know what to do. He or she does that. It doesn't bother me <em>because I'm not my character</em>. I wouldn't kick in someone's door, kill them, and take all their stuff. My character did that a half a dozen times before lunch and <em>he knows he's still in good standing with a Lawful Good deity</em>. I think my character and I wouldn't exactly see eye to eye on moral justifications.</p><p></p><p>Collapsing the orc baby evil/innocent wave function is a <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> scenario that doesn't belong in the game. Similarly, rape is a <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> scenario that doesn't belong in the game. They're not interesting and, worse, they're not fun.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bacon Bits, post: 6594463, member: 6777737"] I thought of another one which pretty much every DM tries at some point, particularly if there are Lawful Good party members, especially if you're playing in 3e or earlier, and doubly so if there's a Paladin in the group. Few people try it more than once, because the situation is pretty :):):):):):):):) for the players, and if handled poorly can end a campaign. I was reminded by this exchange from earlier: See, because killing and murder are a part of the game all the time, and we never think twice about it because its always monsters. Except for one situation.... Orc babies. You know the trope. You're clearing a dungeon, and your party comes across den of orcs. You clear them out. You get to the last room, where you find a group of cowering orc women and children. They're clearly non-combatants, and because of the morality system of the game they're in a Schrodinger's box where they're simultaneously irredeemably evil and purely innocent, you don't know if you should kill them or let them live. Now the players are forced with three choices: a) kill ostensibly innocent humanoids, b) release creatures who will inevitably be evil and hostile when grown, and c) arrest everybody and give them to some legal or divine authority to sort out. DMs seem to like to add this scenario because it adds depth. The problem is, it doesn't. At best it deadlocks the game while the players argue. At worst, the party stops adventuring to play prison escort. The whole scenario is interesting to roleplay for about 5 minutes, and it inevitably takes far longer. See, the scenario requires a type of morality that the D&D game world [I]doesn't have[/I]. The game often says there are irredeemably evil creatures, and racial enmities which reach all the way to [I]deities[/I]. The real problem with the scenario is that the solution to this problem would be in Paladin Training 101. Every [I]character[/I] in the game world knows exactly what needs to be done in this situation, but [I]the players[/I] often won't. The [I]characters[/I] know the law. The [I]characters[/I] know church doctrine. Worst case scenario, the players have their god on speed dial and can ask him or her what they should do. This situation should be a [I]settled matter of doctrine[/I]. The [I]players[/I] have no idea, however, because [I]they weren't raised in the game world[/I] and don't know what to do. They're screwed because the DM can punish you no matter what you do by changing the way the world works after the fact. It was especially bad when you were a 1e-3e Paladin with a code of conduct. Now a character is faced with a no-win situation that [i]cripples his character[/i]. It's injecting our shaded morality which relies on the fact that [I]everything[/I] is subjective into a world where morality is [I]often objective[/I] because you can directly ask a true moral authority when you have questions. In D&D, morality walks on two legs and performs miracles for creatures that worship it. It's not like we can call up Jesus of Nazareth or Siddhartha Gautama or Muhammad or Hades or Odin or Horus or Quetzalcoatl and ask how to handle no-win sitations. D&D characters [i]can[/i]. Often [I]literally[/I]. "But the Kobayashi Maru is a great test of character that requires you to expand beyond yourself and redefine your character!" F*** you, DM. My character should already know what to do. He or she does that. It doesn't bother me [I]because I'm not my character[/I]. I wouldn't kick in someone's door, kill them, and take all their stuff. My character did that a half a dozen times before lunch and [i]he knows he's still in good standing with a Lawful Good deity[/i]. I think my character and I wouldn't exactly see eye to eye on moral justifications. Collapsing the orc baby evil/innocent wave function is a :):):):):):):):) scenario that doesn't belong in the game. Similarly, rape is a :):):):):):):):) scenario that doesn't belong in the game. They're not interesting and, worse, they're not fun. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Dragonborn inter-species breeding?
Top