Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- individual adventure modules! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed to plug in to your game.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Dragons aren't that strong, are they?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Infiniti2000" data-source="post: 2879629" data-attributes="member: 31734"><p>(Psi)SeveredHead, you need to redo all your comparisons fairly. That is, don't selectively choose the optimum build for a PC and not the dragon, don't use good PC tactics and stupid dragon tactics, don't allow the PC's equipment but not the dragon, etc. I find your initial post equivalent to: "If an optimized build of four PC's encounters a naked, penniless dragon in an open field (or not, depending on what the PC's want), then the dragon isn't strong!"</p><p></p><p>Unfortunately, the hardest part about comparisons is probably the most influential in the fight: location, location, location. A fight over the ledge in a volcano that is the only way into the dragon's lair is a far different affair to defeat the red dragon that when you encounter one in the woods with its virtual pants down doing a #2. <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /></p><p></p><p>So, this is what you do. For each level you want to compare (notes below), (1) build a group of four PC's, PB25, standard wealth guidelines. (2) Build 5 dragons of equivalent CR, of totally different types and strengths/weaknesses. (3) Pick a locale that suits each dragon. (4) If the PC's stomp each of the five dragons, then your case is made. If not, then it's not.</p><p></p><p>(1) That's what the CR's were based on. Actually, it was all core, so use even that with a grain of salt. I wouldn't restrict either the PCs or dragon to core, though.</p><p></p><p>(2) This avoids the PC-build-tailor-made-to-a-red-dragon scenario that ALWAYS comes up in this comparison discussions. That red dragon bane unholy weapon is a lot less effective against a sand dragon.</p><p></p><p>(3) Of course. The PCs are the heroes and need to GO TO THE DRAGON, not that other way around. If you want to run it as a random encounter, well, that's just not correct.</p><p></p><p>(4) Together with #3, you need to show the PC's are much better than the dragon across the board. An optimized setup against one type of dragon will suck against others. I will still say that any build you make of the party will be stacked against dragons, but that's NOT the way a normal party is made, so it's unfair. And, note that a dragon of equal CR is only supposed to consume about 25% of the resources, so the heroes need to stomp it and stomp it good for the dragon not to be a decent power level for its CR.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Infiniti2000, post: 2879629, member: 31734"] (Psi)SeveredHead, you need to redo all your comparisons fairly. That is, don't selectively choose the optimum build for a PC and not the dragon, don't use good PC tactics and stupid dragon tactics, don't allow the PC's equipment but not the dragon, etc. I find your initial post equivalent to: "If an optimized build of four PC's encounters a naked, penniless dragon in an open field (or not, depending on what the PC's want), then the dragon isn't strong!" Unfortunately, the hardest part about comparisons is probably the most influential in the fight: location, location, location. A fight over the ledge in a volcano that is the only way into the dragon's lair is a far different affair to defeat the red dragon that when you encounter one in the woods with its virtual pants down doing a #2. :lol: So, this is what you do. For each level you want to compare (notes below), (1) build a group of four PC's, PB25, standard wealth guidelines. (2) Build 5 dragons of equivalent CR, of totally different types and strengths/weaknesses. (3) Pick a locale that suits each dragon. (4) If the PC's stomp each of the five dragons, then your case is made. If not, then it's not. (1) That's what the CR's were based on. Actually, it was all core, so use even that with a grain of salt. I wouldn't restrict either the PCs or dragon to core, though. (2) This avoids the PC-build-tailor-made-to-a-red-dragon scenario that ALWAYS comes up in this comparison discussions. That red dragon bane unholy weapon is a lot less effective against a sand dragon. (3) Of course. The PCs are the heroes and need to GO TO THE DRAGON, not that other way around. If you want to run it as a random encounter, well, that's just not correct. (4) Together with #3, you need to show the PC's are much better than the dragon across the board. An optimized setup against one type of dragon will suck against others. I will still say that any build you make of the party will be stacked against dragons, but that's NOT the way a normal party is made, so it's unfair. And, note that a dragon of equal CR is only supposed to consume about 25% of the resources, so the heroes need to stomp it and stomp it good for the dragon not to be a decent power level for its CR. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Dragons aren't that strong, are they?
Top