Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Dragons
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Xylix" data-source="post: 501689" data-attributes="member: 9089"><p>The scientific method is the only proven method to result in consistent highly succesfull results. This method operates be constantly revaluating its own presumptions.</p><p></p><p>If you want your method to be a good CR measurement you will have to do the same. Having conviction is good when standing before the players. Having conviction is good when presenting your ideas. Having so much conviction that you don't reanalyzing them on a discussion on that particular topic is very bad.</p><p></p><p>If you aren't reanlyzing them you don't have a place in a dicussion pertaining specifically to reanlysis. That said, it does not mean YOUR end anyalysis might differ from others.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As it was a single figher was using 90% of his resources.</p><p></p><p>This means two fighers killing the creature twice as fast, and having double hp would use 25% of their resources.</p><p></p><p>Following the same idea a party of four would use 6%. That is not a challenge according to the DM's manual.... </p><p></p><p>Now remember those where SIMPLE fighers, well built ones might be even more dangerous, and as such the Black dragon would be even less effective.</p><p></p><p>Or for most players. A Young black dragon is a challenge for a party of two fighters, that means you need to drop the CR 2 to 4 points. How much varies upon tests, and special abilities. I can't say what for sure, no lower than CR 6 though, and no higher than CR 8. Otherwise it will be no danger at all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Xylix, post: 501689, member: 9089"] The scientific method is the only proven method to result in consistent highly succesfull results. This method operates be constantly revaluating its own presumptions. If you want your method to be a good CR measurement you will have to do the same. Having conviction is good when standing before the players. Having conviction is good when presenting your ideas. Having so much conviction that you don't reanalyzing them on a discussion on that particular topic is very bad. If you aren't reanlyzing them you don't have a place in a dicussion pertaining specifically to reanlysis. That said, it does not mean YOUR end anyalysis might differ from others. As it was a single figher was using 90% of his resources. This means two fighers killing the creature twice as fast, and having double hp would use 25% of their resources. Following the same idea a party of four would use 6%. That is not a challenge according to the DM's manual.... Now remember those where SIMPLE fighers, well built ones might be even more dangerous, and as such the Black dragon would be even less effective. Or for most players. A Young black dragon is a challenge for a party of two fighters, that means you need to drop the CR 2 to 4 points. How much varies upon tests, and special abilities. I can't say what for sure, no lower than CR 6 though, and no higher than CR 8. Otherwise it will be no danger at all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Dragons
Top