Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="bogmad" data-source="post: 6165242" data-attributes="member: 6695559">So now it looks like we're not going to get core rule books with art that reflects a variety of the worlds?&nbsp; I understand the need for a consistent vision, and I'm not even upset if all the art in the MM is from a Forgotten Realms base design.&nbsp; I would however, like to see a variety of art styles represented, especially in the other core rulebooks.&nbsp; I've already seen a lot of complaints about the one default tone for fourth edition; why do that again?&nbsp; The MM? Ok, I could see a lot of the default monster illustrations being similar styles, but it'd be nice to get some line drawing mixed in with nice painted &quot;realistic&quot; depictions every now and then, if only to give the imagination a chance to breathe.Covers and promotional materials, sure keep that all similar, but why not let folks be surprised by the breadth of possibilities once they delve deeper inside?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="bogmad, post: 6165242, member: 6695559"] So now it looks like we're not going to get core rule books with art that reflects a variety of the worlds? I understand the need for a consistent vision, and I'm not even upset if all the art in the MM is from a Forgotten Realms base design. I [I]would[/I] however, like to see a variety of art styles represented, [I] especially [/I]in the other core rulebooks. I've already seen a lot of complaints about the one default tone for fourth edition; why do that again? The MM? Ok, I could see a lot of the default monster illustrations being similar styles, but it'd be nice to get some line drawing mixed in with nice painted "realistic" depictions every now and then, if only to give the imagination a chance to breathe. Covers and promotional materials, sure keep that all similar, but why not let folks be surprised by the breadth of possibilities once they delve deeper inside? [/QUOTE]

Verification