Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Kithas" data-source="post: 6773579" data-attributes="member: 97587">I am seeing that we have different ideas of what a shield is... I wouldn't give someone +2ac for a pot lid. Since we only have one type of shield, no option of buckler or tower. I assume it to be a medium shield. At least this size;<img src="http://www.victorianweb.org/art/illustration/selous/11c.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" />I will give that you could probably put the dagger in that hand but you would have to be careful about it, I would still have it cost the interaction, giving the advantage over dropped that you don't lose it if you move.That's exactly what I am saying. The base rules all by themselves, not taking feats into consideration at all, don't let you do the things you are listing. You are actually citing feats, and by not using them, claiming a change to the base rules.If I had Chris Perkins in my game playing Dizzt Dourden himself, without feats, I would require him to take one object interaction per sword. Story doesn't change the RAW, you can houserule them or ignore them but they don't change.Yes Rule0 exists for a reason and at any table at any time the DM can overrule the written rules for any reason he sees fit. This doesn't throw out the rulebook though. The rules still have a clear way they say things are supposed to go and anything else is an exception or a houserule.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Kithas, post: 6773579, member: 97587"] I am seeing that we have different ideas of what a shield is... I wouldn't give someone +2ac for a pot lid. Since we only have one type of shield, no option of buckler or tower. I assume it to be a medium shield. At least this size; [IMG]http://www.victorianweb.org/art/illustration/selous/11c.jpg[/IMG] I will give that you could probably put the dagger in that hand but you would have to be careful about it, I would still have it cost the interaction, giving the advantage over dropped that you don't lose it if you move. That's exactly what I am saying. The base rules all by themselves, not taking feats into consideration at all, don't let you do the things you are listing. You are actually citing feats, and by not using them, claiming a change to the base rules. If I had Chris Perkins in my game playing Dizzt Dourden himself, without feats, I would require him to take one object interaction per sword. Story doesn't change the RAW, you can houserule them or ignore them but they don't change. Yes Rule0 exists for a reason and at any table at any time the DM can overrule the written rules for any reason he sees fit. This doesn't throw out the rulebook though. The rules still have a clear way they say things are supposed to go and anything else is an exception or a houserule. [/QUOTE]

Verification