Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Draw Steel News
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Enrahim" data-source="post: 9726434" data-attributes="member: 7025577"><p>Remember that kit is weapon<em><strong>s</strong></em> and armor.</p><p></p><p>In draw steel the melee weapon part is just melee damage, melee range, and feature. The ranged part is for any ranged weapons in the kit (damage, range, feature). You have both types of weapon in Daggerheart, and they also have damage (3 numbers - die count, die type and bonus) and range - but you have burden and trait on top of that (+ damage type if you include implements).</p><p></p><p>And in daggerheart the shield get a full secondary weapon treatment, while in Draw Steel it is simply a stamina bonus (+ feature)</p><p></p><p>Any added complexity in Kit from Draw steel seem to rather be accounting for the armor part. I think speed, disengage, stamina and stability can be related to this. On first impression Daggerheart is a bit simpler as it only has moderate and severe treshold, and base score. However looking at the features, it also even in tbe base tier 1 setup also affect evasion and agility. And even worse it has the dynamic number of armor slots associated with it that needs to be keep track of (vs the purely static numbers of draw steel).</p><p></p><p>So even if you split out weapons and armor as seperate entities in Draw Steel it seem to me like you get something <em>simpler</em> than in Daggerheart. But the real big simplification in my eyes that prompted my comment was indeed this merging of all three concepts into kits at the base level. Draw Steel give us out of the box 21 highly distinct and flavorful loadouts.</p><p></p><p>Daggerheart give us 12 base melee main weapons, 3 ranged weapons, 7 secondary weapons and 4 armors. That is 26 things to consider. The exact number og viable kits is a bit hard to calculate, as having nothing counts as a posibility, and secondary weapons are less relevant with a two handed weapon. But as just multiplying these numbers togetter give us just over 1000 I think we can quite safely say we have at least an order of magnitude more possible base loadouts than draw steel. Choosing between these certanly seem more "crunchy"...</p><p></p><p></p><p>I put that in the "content" bucket. I didn't see much rules regarding it? That is where is the <em>crunch</em>?</p><p></p><p>Edit: Ok, some of the features in environements do feature some crunch - and I do agree there are no corresponding elements in Draw Steel. Some of it is covered by environemental hassards, but not all. Some of it also seem to have similarities with montages. Not sure how heavily this will affect actual play though?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Enrahim, post: 9726434, member: 7025577"] Remember that kit is weapon[I][B]s[/B][/I] and armor. In draw steel the melee weapon part is just melee damage, melee range, and feature. The ranged part is for any ranged weapons in the kit (damage, range, feature). You have both types of weapon in Daggerheart, and they also have damage (3 numbers - die count, die type and bonus) and range - but you have burden and trait on top of that (+ damage type if you include implements). And in daggerheart the shield get a full secondary weapon treatment, while in Draw Steel it is simply a stamina bonus (+ feature) Any added complexity in Kit from Draw steel seem to rather be accounting for the armor part. I think speed, disengage, stamina and stability can be related to this. On first impression Daggerheart is a bit simpler as it only has moderate and severe treshold, and base score. However looking at the features, it also even in tbe base tier 1 setup also affect evasion and agility. And even worse it has the dynamic number of armor slots associated with it that needs to be keep track of (vs the purely static numbers of draw steel). So even if you split out weapons and armor as seperate entities in Draw Steel it seem to me like you get something [I]simpler[/I] than in Daggerheart. But the real big simplification in my eyes that prompted my comment was indeed this merging of all three concepts into kits at the base level. Draw Steel give us out of the box 21 highly distinct and flavorful loadouts. Daggerheart give us 12 base melee main weapons, 3 ranged weapons, 7 secondary weapons and 4 armors. That is 26 things to consider. The exact number og viable kits is a bit hard to calculate, as having nothing counts as a posibility, and secondary weapons are less relevant with a two handed weapon. But as just multiplying these numbers togetter give us just over 1000 I think we can quite safely say we have at least an order of magnitude more possible base loadouts than draw steel. Choosing between these certanly seem more "crunchy"... I put that in the "content" bucket. I didn't see much rules regarding it? That is where is the [I]crunch[/I]? Edit: Ok, some of the features in environements do feature some crunch - and I do agree there are no corresponding elements in Draw Steel. Some of it is covered by environemental hassards, but not all. Some of it also seem to have similarities with montages. Not sure how heavily this will affect actual play though? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Draw Steel News
Top