Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="maddman75" data-source="post: 1593019" data-attributes="member: 2673">I don't support panning the companies altogether.  Several on RPGNet have claimed they will do so (but then they do that when a designer is curt on a message board <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue    :p"  data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /> ).  Here is my response to that idea.-----------------------------------I am boycotting - I'm boycotting DriveThruRPG.com. I won't be buying any of their products. Analogy time.Lets say that McDonalds gets an exclusive distribution deal for Coke fountain soda - just for the sake of arguement. Now you don't have a problem with Coke, but you believe that Ronald McDonald eats babies. You want to send a clear message to McDonalds that they need to lose this cannibalistic clown.So you don't go to McDonalds. Does that mean you should not buy cans and 2-liters of coke at the grocery store, because you don't like how one place that sells their product does business? Not only is that not communicating to McDonalds, its punishing Coke for no reason.</blockquote>