Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Will" data-source="post: 239570" data-attributes="member: 5566">The biggest problem with fighters is they have a 'flat' progression.That is, a Fighter 16>17th level is not a tremendously different jump than, say, 2>3.True, a fighter accumulates a heap of feats, and has a few perks (weapon specialization, broad proficiencies, etc)A cleric, on the other hand, going from 16>17th level gets some mighty magics. Sure, his BAB is 5 less, and he doesn't have the huge wack of feats... but 9th level spells? Yeek. And _two_ good saves.Personally, I think there is a big problem, when you look at fighter progression vs. other classes. I also think there is a big problem with spellcaster progression. Unfortunately, it really looks like spellcasters should never multiclass (except with prestige classes that add directly to caster level). Now, fighters, rangers, and rogues, cool. A fighter with a few levels of spellcaster, also cool.In short, I agree, particularly at higher levels. (6+?)-=Will</blockquote>