Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DrSpunj" data-source="post: 1484719" data-attributes="member: 994">Well, realize we're only really categorizing feats into two types. Originally I was using Combat &amp; non-Combat, while ouini has tried organizing instead along themes and has a Base cost and an Expansion cost. If you're truly going to use the sheet to see how things balance the classes you really must use some sort of guideline to compare abilities. After all, is Nature Sense really equivalent in value to a Fighter Bonus feat? In your opinion, it may be, but it's a question that needs to be answered.Thanks!&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> Usually that's true, though depending upon how you organize/classify the class abilities, some are definitely out of whack. As you noted the Druid &amp; Ranger both come out looking pretty good. With the Druid I'm sure that's accurate. With the Ranger, well, I'd agree that he's a bit on the high side, but not so much as the Druid, IMO. The Bard also can look too good depending on how you organize his abilities.I am!&nbsp; <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing&nbsp; &nbsp; :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" />&nbsp; I'll see how things turn out after playing with ouini's ability classifications, but so far they are working well. I'm almost done with Druids...Thanks.DrSpunj</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DrSpunj, post: 1484719, member: 994"] Well, realize we're only really categorizing feats into two types. Originally I was using Combat & non-Combat, while [b]ouini[/b] has tried organizing instead along themes and has a Base cost and an Expansion cost. If you're truly going to use the sheet to see how things balance the classes you really [u]must[/u] use some sort of guideline to compare abilities. After all, is Nature Sense really equivalent in value to a Fighter Bonus feat? In your opinion, it may be, but it's a question that needs to be answered. Thanks! :) Usually that's true, though depending upon how you organize/classify the class abilities, some are definitely out of whack. As you noted the Druid & Ranger both come out looking pretty good. With the Druid I'm sure that's accurate. With the Ranger, well, I'd agree that he's a bit on the high side, but not so much as the Druid, IMO. The Bard also [i]can[/i] look too good depending on how you organize his abilities. I am! :lol: I'll see how things turn out after playing with [b]ouini[/b]'s ability classifications, but so far they are working well. I'm almost done with Druids... Thanks. DrSpunj [/QUOTE]

Verification