Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- individual adventure modules! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed to plug in to your game.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Druid/Monk combo
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kerbarian" data-source="post: 3034861" data-attributes="member: 40393"><p>Clearly the "Flurry of Blows Attack Bonus" column has the same type of scope as the "Base Attack Bonus" column in the same table. It can be modified by a whole bunch of things. It was a poor choice on my part to describe it as "only the attacks that would be gained from BAB plus flurry", which implies that it can't be modified.</p><p></p><p>From the perspective of the MM, though, all the attacks of a fighter with BAB +11/+6/+1 (which can be modified by off-hand weapons, haste, etc.) count as a "manufactured weapon attack". The MM says</p><p></p><p>"Some creatures combine attacks with natural and manufactured weapons when they make a full attack. When they do so, the manufactured weapon attack is considered the primary attack unless the creature’s description indicates otherwise and any natural weapons the creature also uses are considered secondary natural attacks."</p><p></p><p>What I'm saying about that column in the monk table is that it sets the scope of a flurry of blows to be the same as the scope of a full attack made based on BAB. As such, it would be "considered the primary attack", and other, secondary natural attacks could be made in addition to it. The entire flurry of blows is the primary attack, and the secondary attacks are separate from that, so they wouldn't be part of the flurry of blows and thus wouldn't be subject to the weapon restrictions of flurry of blows.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kerbarian, post: 3034861, member: 40393"] Clearly the "Flurry of Blows Attack Bonus" column has the same type of scope as the "Base Attack Bonus" column in the same table. It can be modified by a whole bunch of things. It was a poor choice on my part to describe it as "only the attacks that would be gained from BAB plus flurry", which implies that it can't be modified. From the perspective of the MM, though, all the attacks of a fighter with BAB +11/+6/+1 (which can be modified by off-hand weapons, haste, etc.) count as a "manufactured weapon attack". The MM says "Some creatures combine attacks with natural and manufactured weapons when they make a full attack. When they do so, the manufactured weapon attack is considered the primary attack unless the creature’s description indicates otherwise and any natural weapons the creature also uses are considered secondary natural attacks." What I'm saying about that column in the monk table is that it sets the scope of a flurry of blows to be the same as the scope of a full attack made based on BAB. As such, it would be "considered the primary attack", and other, secondary natural attacks could be made in addition to it. The entire flurry of blows is the primary attack, and the secondary attacks are separate from that, so they wouldn't be part of the flurry of blows and thus wouldn't be subject to the weapon restrictions of flurry of blows. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Druid/Monk combo
Top