Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Arrowhawk" data-source="post: 5741964" data-attributes="member: 6679551">Let me quote myself from above:Now that that's out of the way....Very plausible explanation.&nbsp; Unfortunately, if it's accurate, it only clouds the issue.&nbsp; Let's look:In previous versions, a Druid was only immune to &quot;natural&quot; poisons.&nbsp; This list was more restrictive than the Paladin immunity.&nbsp;&nbsp; Now you're saying that when they intended to expand the Paladin immunity, they made sure to include supernatural and magical diseases?&nbsp; Well, its stands to reason that WotC should have done the same for Druids, doesn't it?&nbsp; In fact, it would be even more necessary to clarify for Druids because there are no supernatural or magical poisons on any list of poisons.&nbsp; I''m even betting that nearly all, if not all, the poisonous attacks by creatures in the MM's are Extraordinary (non-magical) abilities (Black Dragons in Dragon Magic can convert spells to poison attacks, being one notable exception).&nbsp; So for the very reason you claim WotC clarified Paladins, WotC had cause to clarify Druids to include poison spells...if we call that magic poison.&nbsp; But they didn't.I'm going to repeat myself again, for all those who don't have the maturity to ignore a thread if they think the matter is decided:</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Arrowhawk, post: 5741964, member: 6679551"] Let me quote myself from above: Now that that's out of the way.... Very plausible explanation. Unfortunately, if it's accurate, it only clouds the issue. Let's look: In previous versions, a Druid was only immune to "natural" poisons. This list was more restrictive than the Paladin immunity. Now you're saying that when they intended to expand the Paladin immunity, they made sure to include supernatural and magical diseases? Well, its stands to reason that WotC should have done the same for Druids, doesn't it? In fact, it would be even more necessary to clarify for Druids because there are no supernatural or magical poisons on any list of poisons. I''m even betting that nearly all, if not all, the poisonous attacks by creatures in the MM's are Extraordinary (non-magical) abilities (Black Dragons in Dragon Magic can convert spells to poison attacks, being one notable exception). So for the very reason you claim WotC clarified Paladins, WotC had cause to clarify Druids to include poison spells...if we call that magic poison. But they didn't. I'm going to repeat myself again, for all those who don't have the maturity to ignore a thread if they think the matter is decided: [/QUOTE]

Verification