Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Druid's Venom Immunity
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LiL KiNG" data-source="post: 5742547" data-attributes="member: 83799"><p>Arrowhawk, now I don't know all the books and rules inside and out but I really don't understand why you're reading so hard into this when consensus, here at least, seems to be that they [Druids] are, or should be, immune to all poisons. </p><p></p><p>I've brought this up with a couple of old D&D buddies from outside my current gaming group who made the 3.0-3.5 transition with me and from the way we all read and understand it, if 'poison' is in the descriptor than the Druid is immune to it (at 9th level and beyond of course). It doesn't specify between 'natural' or 'magical' because it means 'all' - and WotC also didn't say "immune to all poisons except...", so again, all would mean all right? </p><p></p><p>I see you refer to the 3.0 Druids having only natural poison immunity, well I say that is irrelevant. Should we compare the hitdie of the 3.0 ranger vs. the 3.5 ranger? or the difference in their class abilities? No, we shouldn't because it's pointless. 3.5 made changes that supersede 3.0, so by their decision to drop 'natural' from the Druids poison immunity description and add 'all', unless WotC chimes in on it, we can assume (and luckily my gaming group does) that 'all' indeed means all. </p><p>[why the distinction for the Paladin's disease immunity then as you liken this to, unknown - maybe different authors wrote up the different classes and they didn't use the same lingo]</p><p></p><p>I guess, even no matter what WotC meant in their writing of that Druid ability, that the DM is the final say at the table - it's gotten hard to tell which way you are arguing for anymore; are you playing devil's advocate or are you seriously saying that 'all' poisons doesn't mean 'all' poisons... but if you're the latter, all I can say is I'm glad I don't play at your table <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /> </p><p></p><p>I'm out. No matter what else you say or think, in our group Druids are immune to all poisons once they have that ability and that's all that matters to us - I can't believe this thread is now 5 pages...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LiL KiNG, post: 5742547, member: 83799"] Arrowhawk, now I don't know all the books and rules inside and out but I really don't understand why you're reading so hard into this when consensus, here at least, seems to be that they [Druids] are, or should be, immune to all poisons. I've brought this up with a couple of old D&D buddies from outside my current gaming group who made the 3.0-3.5 transition with me and from the way we all read and understand it, if 'poison' is in the descriptor than the Druid is immune to it (at 9th level and beyond of course). It doesn't specify between 'natural' or 'magical' because it means 'all' - and WotC also didn't say "immune to all poisons except...", so again, all would mean all right? I see you refer to the 3.0 Druids having only natural poison immunity, well I say that is irrelevant. Should we compare the hitdie of the 3.0 ranger vs. the 3.5 ranger? or the difference in their class abilities? No, we shouldn't because it's pointless. 3.5 made changes that supersede 3.0, so by their decision to drop 'natural' from the Druids poison immunity description and add 'all', unless WotC chimes in on it, we can assume (and luckily my gaming group does) that 'all' indeed means all. [why the distinction for the Paladin's disease immunity then as you liken this to, unknown - maybe different authors wrote up the different classes and they didn't use the same lingo] I guess, even no matter what WotC meant in their writing of that Druid ability, that the DM is the final say at the table - it's gotten hard to tell which way you are arguing for anymore; are you playing devil's advocate or are you seriously saying that 'all' poisons doesn't mean 'all' poisons... but if you're the latter, all I can say is I'm glad I don't play at your table :p I'm out. No matter what else you say or think, in our group Druids are immune to all poisons once they have that ability and that's all that matters to us - I can't believe this thread is now 5 pages... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Druid's Venom Immunity
Top