Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="jgsugden" data-source="post: 1301211" data-attributes="member: 2629">I think the key underlying all of our arguments is this: If the players enjoy it, do it. If the players don't enjoy it, don't do it (or replace the players). I've run groups where the players look bored any time there is not active combat. "The King is getting Married? I attack! I see a peasant? I attack! There is an earthworm in the road? I attack!" Any rules issue not directly related to combat slows these games down, so I minimize everything I can to compress as much violence into a session as possible.I've run groups where characters spend days in their little house in the country discussing how they'll approach a minor change in the political structure in their country created when a king in a country hundreds of miles away dies (for reasons unknown to the PCs) and a steward (who is also unknown to the PCs) is put on the throne. The players themselves sat for days discussing the ramifications, doing research, summoning experts to provide information, casting spells to gather information, etc ... I had to make up hundreds of rules and pieces of info on the fly for that game to keep the sense of realism going. "What is on the map? I mean, specifically, what types of stains? Are there any tea stains? What do I need to roll to determine what types of stains are on the map? How long does it take?"You're making the 'movie'. If you don't give your 'audience' what it wants, they won't enjoy it. A good 'director' can make a movie with surprising elements that 'audiences' did not realize that they enjoyed, but in general, if the players don't like what the DM does, the game is boring or annoying.</blockquote>

Verification