Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ovinomancer" data-source="post: 8678602" data-attributes="member: 16814">As a 1st Amendment superfan, this is a bad take.  The relationship between DTRPG and their customers, both providers and buyers, is contract driven.  And that clause does not implicate the freedom of speech in any way. As for your general argument about free speech and consequences, I'm almost 100% positive that you would not support that someone making strident racist remarks must be fully accommodated by a member of the race they are demeaning in all ways, including continuing to associate with them, do business with them, and refraining from saying anything bad about them in return.  This is the outcome you're arguing.I get your point, though, you think that a big company like DTRPG (heh, big) that has a large footprint in a market should not be able to say things like "don't defame us or we cut you off."  To you, this feels like they're telling you what you can and can't say.  They aren't.  You can still say whatever you want.  But just like you're free to say whatever you want, they are free to end their voluntary association with you.  That you might or might not rely on income based on that voluntary association, or that you might or might not have other viable options for that income, is entirely beside the point.  Your rights do not remove the same rights of others.</blockquote>