Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Guest&nbsp; 85555" data-source="post: 8678919"><p>I am not accusing them of harm. And they aren't obligated to do anything. But I do think it is fair for publishers and customers to express opinions on what they think OBS ought to do, given the size of their position in the industry. I am saying this policy seems unwise and I feel like critiquing it is valid. Any report policy that takes the product down for two weeks automatically from a single report, that is bad for publishers once people realize they can exploit (that it hasn't been exploited is frankly stunning to me). I honestly don't know whether the issue has caused any problems or not yet because I don't know how many have or have not been taken down for review. But that is crippling for a publisher, so I think it is more than fair for publishers if they get pulled for two weeks to raise concern about this issue (and it is one of the issues publishers raise as a concern more frequently). Solutions to the bad policy don't require more staff. Something as simple as changing the threshold of reports for having it come down automatically could be a good fix. Or fixing it on the other side (so publishers don't lose out on a big launch)</p></blockquote><p></p>