Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Duelist -- Doesn't work as advertised?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Particle_Man" data-source="post: 1047597" data-attributes="member: 892"><p>Is it just me or does the Duelist not work as advertised?  On the one hand, if you do without armour, you seem to be giving up a lot more than you are getting.  (You get +Int bonus to AC, double your Mobility feat AC for Aoo's due to movement, and get +2 to reflex save).  Oh, and you can get precise strike while in armour, if you give up a shield and keep your hand free.  But the AC bonus of even moderately magical armour would seem to outweigh the AC bonus you gain, except perhaps for cases where mobility comes into question (and when it comes to higher levels, magical armour would likely be better even then).</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, one could wear full plate and gain the other abilities of the duelist, including the super AC bonus for fighting defensively (+7 to +10, on top of other defensive bonuses!).  I think a strong enough fighter would do better to fight with a two-handed weapon for the extra strength bonus to damage than rely on precise strike, or else, if one wants to be defensive, could use a shield.</p><p></p><p>If one is a dwarf, one can even tumble in full plate, thus taking advantage of some aspects of that acrobatic charge ability.</p><p></p><p>But then, we seem to have left the concept of duelist behind, (as a lightly armoured, intelligent fighter).  So why does the duelist work so much better outside of its own concept?  That seems weird to me.</p><p></p><p>I was trying to see if it mixed well with other non-fighter classes.  Rogue maybe, but I think the rogue perks outweigh the duelist ones, and rogues can wear mithral shirts and use masterwork bucklers.</p><p></p><p>Wizards at least use their INT bonuses, but duelist does not allow them to increase spellcaster level.  EK would be a much better bet for the wizard.</p><p></p><p>Monks might work, but this splits the ac bonus to three stats (maybe good, maybe bad), and more relevantly, the monks hands are not piercing and so don't work with precise strike.</p><p></p><p>I don't want to sound an alarm on duelist.  I am sure I am missing something.  But what am I missing?  Why does the duelist not work as advertised, and work better going the heavily armoured dwarf route?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Particle_Man, post: 1047597, member: 892"] Is it just me or does the Duelist not work as advertised? On the one hand, if you do without armour, you seem to be giving up a lot more than you are getting. (You get +Int bonus to AC, double your Mobility feat AC for Aoo's due to movement, and get +2 to reflex save). Oh, and you can get precise strike while in armour, if you give up a shield and keep your hand free. But the AC bonus of even moderately magical armour would seem to outweigh the AC bonus you gain, except perhaps for cases where mobility comes into question (and when it comes to higher levels, magical armour would likely be better even then). On the other hand, one could wear full plate and gain the other abilities of the duelist, including the super AC bonus for fighting defensively (+7 to +10, on top of other defensive bonuses!). I think a strong enough fighter would do better to fight with a two-handed weapon for the extra strength bonus to damage than rely on precise strike, or else, if one wants to be defensive, could use a shield. If one is a dwarf, one can even tumble in full plate, thus taking advantage of some aspects of that acrobatic charge ability. But then, we seem to have left the concept of duelist behind, (as a lightly armoured, intelligent fighter). So why does the duelist work so much better outside of its own concept? That seems weird to me. I was trying to see if it mixed well with other non-fighter classes. Rogue maybe, but I think the rogue perks outweigh the duelist ones, and rogues can wear mithral shirts and use masterwork bucklers. Wizards at least use their INT bonuses, but duelist does not allow them to increase spellcaster level. EK would be a much better bet for the wizard. Monks might work, but this splits the ac bonus to three stats (maybe good, maybe bad), and more relevantly, the monks hands are not piercing and so don't work with precise strike. I don't want to sound an alarm on duelist. I am sure I am missing something. But what am I missing? Why does the duelist not work as advertised, and work better going the heavily armoured dwarf route? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Duelist -- Doesn't work as advertised?
Top