Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="billd91" data-source="post: 9264008" data-attributes="member: 3400">My general approach is if the rule interpretation makes it produce paradoxical results or makes something that should obviously be possible in the setting impossible, then the interpretation is wrong. My classic example is the tortuous interpretations people put the charging feats through in 3e that, basically, disallowed anyone from gaining benefits from spirited charge. There are times to be careful about rules and times to step back and realize that they exist to operationalize what is going on in the fiction in a fair and reasonable manner. Vampires should be able to take an action to turn back to solid from mist. And warlocks should certainly be able to take the hide action while being "one with shadows".</blockquote>