Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dark Psion" data-source="post: 1144961" data-attributes="member: 959">The adventure format and the adventures themselves are very good. Too bad that there are only two adventures.My problem with this issue is on the Polyhedron side. Aside from the Paladins of Greyhawk article, it's useless.We have Ennies coverage from a couple months ago, RPGA coverage from months ago, and product reviews from months ago. (All of which I got "free" here.)We have a "Rah! Rah! Go Buy some PDFs Rah!" article which makes me ask  "Why is this in my Dungeon magazine?"We have a half dozen pages wasted on some weird feat cards, showing 13 feats from the FR campaign book many, many months ago. (yes, only 13 feats on five pages!)The only good thing here is the Paladins of Greyhawk article, but even it is of limited use to many since Greyhawk has yet to be suported with a sourcebook, despite being the Default setting. (Yes, I know longtime gamers know the references in this article, but consider what 3.0 & 3.5 gamers have seen of Greyhawk.)With each issue, my subscription gets closer to the end. I hoped that with Eric Mona taking over, we would see a better magazine, but this issue does noithing to make me want to re-subscibe. If this issue had been just adventures from cover to cover I wouldn't think twice before signing back up, but with half of it old news, and wasted pages, I almost want half my money back.</blockquote>