Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Erik Mona" data-source="post: 1816034" data-attributes="member: 2174">Some day perhaps you will get to edit Dungeon, and you can publish as much or as little Greyhawk content as you see fit.Until then, it'll be in the magazine. Greyhawk is D&D out of the three core rulebooks. Greyhawk is swords & sorcery in the tradition of Vance, Howard, and Leiber. Greyhawk is also the setting I know like the back of my hand, making it _much_ easier to put together cool articles that don't violate continuity. It's also the "home" of the core pantheon, which many players already use. Technically, any adventure that has a cleric of Pelor in it is a Greyhawk adventure, and most of our "Greyhawk" adventures don't get any more explicit than that.Plus, the setting has been around forever, and if you don't play Greyhawk (I suspect most players use a homebrew world), you have to convert all the proper nouns, anyway.Have you missed the fact that we've printed an Eberron adventure every other issue since 113? We've got at least two more Eberron adventures set to appear in the next five issues. That's at least as many as Wizards of the Coast is producing, and I'm having top-shelf designers like Keith Baker, Andy Collins, and James Wyatt do them. We'll probably do some "Backdrops" that fit into the setting as well, such as new locations on Xen'drik and the like. Eberron is _not_ getting the short shrift at Dungeon (or at Dragon, for that matter).FR, Greyhawk/Core, and Eberron support is not mutually exclusive.--Erik MonaEditor-in-ChiefDragon & Dungeon</blockquote>

Verification