Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Maggan" data-source="post: 914122" data-attributes="member: 6616">Come GenCon...&nbsp;Or it might mean that Paizo has a plan that says it needs to get Dungeon/Polyhedron financially viable fast, or their money runs out, and they have to stop publishing Dungeon. And that the time frame is to try up until GenCon to see if it works.Why set GenCon as a milestone? Maybe, just maybe, it is because they will be going there with thousands and thousands of other gamers,&nbsp; and would like to also talk to people face to face when discussing the fate of Dungeon, rather than just through a message board.I don't feel that he implied that they only talk to the &quot;elite&quot; by discussiong this at GenCon.I got the feeling he actually likes to talk to people, and hear what they are saying in an open and massively interactive 3d environment (GenCon), in addition to reading stuff on the boards. Since he posted here, he is obviously reading what is being posted here. So what's so bad about discussing things at GenCon?On a sidenote, Chris Thommassen got slammed by someone for posting here, and Johnny Wilson gets a lot of grief (admittedly, he can be a bit... enthusiastic), so it's not as if all of us are making them feel welcome here. There eill probably be less of that at GenCon, since most people (including me) are more civil when off the internet.As to my opinions on Dungeon/Polyhedron:1. I don't like the flip side thing.2. I would like to see Dungeon and Polyhedron as separate magazines.3. That thing about subscribers getting more content... I don't like it (but of course, it worked, because I just subscribed again. Still don't like it)4. That new comic... I don't like it. I don't like Bolt&amp;Quiver either.5. Like the layout.6. Like the adventures.7. Find the minigames interesting, although not uselful more than once in a blue moon.That's about it.Cheers!M.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Maggan, post: 914122, member: 6616"] [b]Come GenCon...[/b] Or it might mean that Paizo has a plan that says it needs to get Dungeon/Polyhedron financially viable fast, or their money runs out, and they have to stop publishing Dungeon. And that the time frame is to try up until GenCon to see if it works. Why set GenCon as a milestone? Maybe, just maybe, it is because they will be going there with thousands and thousands of other gamers, and would like to also talk to people face to face when discussing the fate of Dungeon, rather than just through a message board. I don't feel that he implied that they only talk to the "elite" by discussiong this at GenCon. I got the feeling he actually likes to talk to people, and hear what they are saying in an open and massively interactive 3d environment (GenCon), in addition to reading stuff on the boards. Since he posted here, he is obviously reading what is being posted here. So what's so bad about discussing things at GenCon? On a sidenote, Chris Thommassen got slammed by someone for posting here, and Johnny Wilson gets a lot of grief (admittedly, he can be a bit... enthusiastic), so it's not as if all of us are making them feel welcome here. There eill probably be less of that at GenCon, since most people (including me) are more civil when off the internet. As to my opinions on Dungeon/Polyhedron: 1. I don't like the flip side thing. 2. I would like to see Dungeon and Polyhedron as separate magazines. 3. That thing about subscribers getting more content... I don't like it (but of course, it worked, because I just subscribed again. Still don't like it) 4. That new comic... I don't like it. I don't like Bolt&Quiver either. 5. Like the layout. 6. Like the adventures. 7. Find the minigames interesting, although not uselful more than once in a blue moon. That's about it. Cheers! M. [/QUOTE]

Verification