Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="SneakyB" data-source="post: 918542" data-attributes="member: 2219">Thank You, Erik, for taking the time and responding to our concerns in a clear, concise, and in my mind, a more civil manner and tone than that taken earlier.&nbsp; I think that many of us who don't like Poly are not necessarily clamoring for it to go away, but don't want to see content in Dungeon sacrificed for the sake of getting a &quot;balanced&quot; mix.&nbsp; IMO, the bottom line here is that many of us have relied on Dungeon for a nice mixture of differing adventures.&nbsp; When the content is cut from typically 3-4 adventures per issue to 1 or 2, we express our dissatisfaction.&nbsp; To have said dissatisfaction summarily ignored (at least that's how many have taken Johnny's comments) just adds insult to injury.I'm perfectly fine with a 'flippy' between Dungeon/Poly if that's what has to be done.&nbsp; What I'm not fine with is paying $7.99 per issue for a magazine that, at most, is going to give me 1-2 adventures with the other 40-60% devoted to content I will never use.&nbsp; This is not to disparage others who do, merely to point out that many (per what I see as a majority of the posts) see it as I do.Having climbed on my soapbox about it, I'll say this.&nbsp; Heed your customers.&nbsp; Praise upon praise has been heaped upon you for the contents of #100.&nbsp; If all issues were of like this, I doubt you would hear anywhere near the number of complaints that have been raised so far.&nbsp; This just proves that Paizo is capable of such great stuff.&nbsp; Number 99, however, again IMO, was complete and utter crap.&nbsp; One adventure (2 for subscribers if you count 16 pages as a decent adventure) is just not worth $7.99 to me.&nbsp; I had every intention of writing in to the Editor on it, but came across this posting and chose to air my grievances here. Keep up the good work, please don't put out content of the caliber of #99, use #100 as a guide to a good mix for your readers.Once again, my 2cp, which, at the rate I've been tossing them about, is about to break me.--Dan</blockquote>

[QUOTE="SneakyB, post: 918542, member: 2219"] Thank You, Erik, for taking the time and responding to our concerns in a clear, concise, and in my mind, a more civil manner and tone than that taken earlier. I think that many of us who don't like Poly are not necessarily clamoring for it to go away, but don't want to see content in Dungeon sacrificed for the sake of getting a "balanced" mix. IMO, the bottom line here is that many of us have relied on Dungeon for a nice mixture of differing adventures. When the content is cut from typically 3-4 adventures per issue to 1 or 2, we express our dissatisfaction. To have said dissatisfaction summarily ignored (at least that's how many have taken Johnny's comments) just adds insult to injury. I'm perfectly fine with a 'flippy' between Dungeon/Poly if that's what has to be done. What I'm not fine with is paying $7.99 per issue for a magazine that, at most, is going to give me 1-2 adventures with the other 40-60% devoted to content I will never use. This is not to disparage others who do, merely to point out that many (per what I see as a majority of the posts) see it as I do. Having climbed on my soapbox about it, I'll say this. Heed your customers. Praise upon praise has been heaped upon you for the contents of #100. If all issues were of like this, I doubt you would hear anywhere near the number of complaints that have been raised so far. This just proves that Paizo is capable of such great stuff. Number 99, however, again IMO, was complete and utter crap. One adventure (2 for subscribers if you count 16 pages as a decent adventure) is just not worth $7.99 to me. I had every intention of writing in to the Editor on it, but came across this posting and chose to air my grievances here. Keep up the good work, please don't put out content of the caliber of #99, use #100 as a guide to a good mix for your readers. Once again, my 2cp, which, at the rate I've been tossing them about, is about to break me. --Dan [/QUOTE]

Verification