Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 594177" data-attributes="member: 957">Um, no offense taken, but please go back and re-read what you are quoting.&nbsp; The quote has nothing in the world to do with what you are attributing it to.Bagpuss directly asked me when the price was increased to $6.&nbsp; That was my answer.&nbsp; Trying to make anything else out of that post is to take it grossly out of context.And 20 years ago????&nbsp; When you said it once I assumed it was a typo, the second time....?You are also wrong in giving credit to Pazio on the price.&nbsp; I don't know what the price history was under TSR and WoTC, but one of the first things Pazio did was up the price.&nbsp; Granted they changed the page count and some other things, so I don't have a complaint there.&nbsp; I am just pointing out a simple fact.&nbsp; That you have given Pazio credit for not raising the price simply goes to show that (using your words ) you are out of touch with reality.&nbsp; (and to call a 33% increase insignificant also seems out of touch to me, not even considering that the new cost of Dungeon product is effectively up 133%)You, like some other posters, have presented a nice little essay on why Pazio's position is valid and praiseworthy.&nbsp; That is all real nice and fine.&nbsp; I see no need to dispute it.&nbsp; But it misses the point.&nbsp; I don't want Poly and I don't intend to spend money on it.&nbsp; Not a word you said begins to address this.Calling for constructive criticism is also nice.&nbsp; I feel I have offered some.&nbsp; Though I can understand if some people have missed that in all the effort I have had to expend defending myself from comments that seem to be unhappy that I dared say anything negative.&nbsp; (A no, I am not claiming that I have been personally attacked or maligned, just that I have had to spend a lot of effort on defense)And, before some says it, I understand that not all of your comments are necessarily aimed at me personally.&nbsp; But I am the only person you quoted and I am clearly on the side you are addressing, so this is my response.Again, I also mean no offense.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BryonD, post: 594177, member: 957"] Um, no offense taken, but please go back and re-read what you are quoting. The quote has nothing in the world to do with what you are attributing it to. Bagpuss directly asked me when the price was increased to $6. That was my answer. Trying to make anything else out of that post is to take it grossly out of context. And 20 years ago???? When you said it once I assumed it was a typo, the second time....? You are also wrong in giving credit to Pazio on the price. I don't know what the price history was under TSR and WoTC, but one of the first things Pazio did was up the price. Granted they changed the page count and some other things, so I don't have a complaint there. I am just pointing out a simple fact. That you have given Pazio credit for not raising the price simply goes to show that (using your words ) you are out of touch with reality. (and to call a 33% increase insignificant also seems out of touch to me, not even considering that the new cost of Dungeon product is effectively up 133%) You, like some other posters, have presented a nice little essay on why Pazio's position is valid and praiseworthy. That is all real nice and fine. I see no need to dispute it. But it misses the point. I don't want Poly and I don't intend to spend money on it. Not a word you said begins to address this. Calling for constructive criticism is also nice. I feel I have offered some. Though I can understand if some people have missed that in all the effort I have had to expend defending myself from comments that seem to be unhappy that I dared say anything negative. (A no, I am not claiming that I have been personally attacked or maligned, just that I have had to spend a lot of effort on defense) And, before some says it, I understand that not all of your comments are necessarily aimed at me personally. But I am the only person you quoted and I am clearly on the side you are addressing, so this is my response. Again, I also mean no offense. [/QUOTE]

Verification