Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Dungeon Mag #101 - slight ranty.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Erik Mona" data-source="post: 989461" data-attributes="member: 2174"><p>Folks,</p><p></p><p>I'd like to thank Brown Jenkin, our lovely human-faced Lovecraftian rat, for posting a summary of the "Paizo on the Mike" Origins seminar. He did a great job covering the basics.</p><p></p><p>I'm currently in the process of getting up to speed on the Dungeon "side" of the magazine, learning the process by which adventures are accepted and developed, and training in our new Associate Editor, James Jacobs (whom you may remember from such adventures as Flood Season and the Porphyry House Horror). Part of this "getting to know the magazine" process involves evaluating newsstand reader, retailer, and subscriber comments in an attempt to improve the magazine.</p><p></p><p>It's clear to me that the last year or so has been a rocky one for many of our readers due to some of the business-motivated decisions that have been made about the magazine. I'll do my best to listen to the concerns of our readers and make changes to the magazine's format based upon those concerns. I advocate a bit of patience, here, as any change I make won't start to seep into the magazine until issue #104 at the earliest. We just sent 102 to the printer today, and the content for #103 is largely set in stone (although I have made some adjustments based upon reader feedback).</p><p></p><p>I should note at this point that I won't possibly be able to please everyone with these changes. I will not, for example, be getting rid of Polyhedron to please those readers who don't care for it.</p><p></p><p>For the foreseeable future, Dungeon and Polyhedron are linked. That's not going to change. We are going to get rid of the "flippy" format, and will be giving Polyhedron an interior cover rather than producing two different print runs just to satisfy the post office. Although we believe Polyhedron "deserves" its own cover, the flippy is just more trouble than it's worth.</p><p></p><p>We'll also be scaling back Mini-Games to roughly 4 per year (certainly no fewer) instead of roughly 6 per year. This isn't because we're running out of genres (far from it!), but because we want more room to devote to exciting games like d20 Modern, Star Wars, Call of Cthulhu, and support for our own Mini-Games (issue #102 has follow-up material for both Pulp Heroes and Iron Lords of Jupiter).</p><p></p><p>I want to get away from forcing our readers to remember which is a "big" Dungeon month and which has more Polyhedron content. Figuring out whether to buy an issue of Dungeon shouldn't be an intense memory/math exercise. Up until now, a lot of readers have looked at the Dungeon/Poly split as some kind of contest. It isn't. When Poly has a Mini-Game, it'll only have a Mini-Game, and that game might take up the bulk of the issue. The other 8 months of the year, Poly will be as large as it needs to be to cover the topics we want to cover, but it won't take up more than half of the issue by any means.</p><p></p><p>The Dungeon side of the magazine _must_ be about the adventures. Notice that I used the plural form. It'll be a long time before the readers get a Dungeon with only one adventure in it again. That was an unhappy cosequence of the shift to monthly while the editors had been planning for a bigger bi-monthly book, and I'm happy to say we're past that rocky stretch and don't plan to return any time soon.</p><p></p><p>Look for more adventures per issue. For the most part, that'll mean shorter adventures. How am I going to work this? That's what I'm trying to figure out. But I'm committed to giving our readers a number of choices each and every issue. If I can work my magic correctly, we'll still have room for huge adventures like the Adventure Path, but I'd rather that be the exception than the norm.</p><p></p><p>I know a lot of you are not incredibly pleased with the recent direction of the magazine. I'll do my best to address those concerns by making changes (some subtle, no doubt) to the magazine's editorial mix. For those of you considering dropping your subscriptions, I ask you to take a look at the cherished issues of past years and give us a little time to woo you back. For those of you who are pleased with the current direction of the magazine, especially fans of Polyhedron, stick with us. We've got a lot of incredible stuff planned for you.</p><p></p><p>Lastly, I urge all interested readers to drop me an email at <a href="mailto:polyhedron@paizo.com">polyhedron@paizo.com</a> with suggestions on what you like or don't like about the magazine. What do you want to see in Dungeon? What are you tired of seeing in Dungeon? Drop me a line and I'll see what I can do.</p><p></p><p>Thanks,</p><p></p><p>Erik Mona</p><p>Editor-in-Chief</p><p>Dungeon/Polyhedron Magazine</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Erik Mona, post: 989461, member: 2174"] Folks, I'd like to thank Brown Jenkin, our lovely human-faced Lovecraftian rat, for posting a summary of the "Paizo on the Mike" Origins seminar. He did a great job covering the basics. I'm currently in the process of getting up to speed on the Dungeon "side" of the magazine, learning the process by which adventures are accepted and developed, and training in our new Associate Editor, James Jacobs (whom you may remember from such adventures as Flood Season and the Porphyry House Horror). Part of this "getting to know the magazine" process involves evaluating newsstand reader, retailer, and subscriber comments in an attempt to improve the magazine. It's clear to me that the last year or so has been a rocky one for many of our readers due to some of the business-motivated decisions that have been made about the magazine. I'll do my best to listen to the concerns of our readers and make changes to the magazine's format based upon those concerns. I advocate a bit of patience, here, as any change I make won't start to seep into the magazine until issue #104 at the earliest. We just sent 102 to the printer today, and the content for #103 is largely set in stone (although I have made some adjustments based upon reader feedback). I should note at this point that I won't possibly be able to please everyone with these changes. I will not, for example, be getting rid of Polyhedron to please those readers who don't care for it. For the foreseeable future, Dungeon and Polyhedron are linked. That's not going to change. We are going to get rid of the "flippy" format, and will be giving Polyhedron an interior cover rather than producing two different print runs just to satisfy the post office. Although we believe Polyhedron "deserves" its own cover, the flippy is just more trouble than it's worth. We'll also be scaling back Mini-Games to roughly 4 per year (certainly no fewer) instead of roughly 6 per year. This isn't because we're running out of genres (far from it!), but because we want more room to devote to exciting games like d20 Modern, Star Wars, Call of Cthulhu, and support for our own Mini-Games (issue #102 has follow-up material for both Pulp Heroes and Iron Lords of Jupiter). I want to get away from forcing our readers to remember which is a "big" Dungeon month and which has more Polyhedron content. Figuring out whether to buy an issue of Dungeon shouldn't be an intense memory/math exercise. Up until now, a lot of readers have looked at the Dungeon/Poly split as some kind of contest. It isn't. When Poly has a Mini-Game, it'll only have a Mini-Game, and that game might take up the bulk of the issue. The other 8 months of the year, Poly will be as large as it needs to be to cover the topics we want to cover, but it won't take up more than half of the issue by any means. The Dungeon side of the magazine _must_ be about the adventures. Notice that I used the plural form. It'll be a long time before the readers get a Dungeon with only one adventure in it again. That was an unhappy cosequence of the shift to monthly while the editors had been planning for a bigger bi-monthly book, and I'm happy to say we're past that rocky stretch and don't plan to return any time soon. Look for more adventures per issue. For the most part, that'll mean shorter adventures. How am I going to work this? That's what I'm trying to figure out. But I'm committed to giving our readers a number of choices each and every issue. If I can work my magic correctly, we'll still have room for huge adventures like the Adventure Path, but I'd rather that be the exception than the norm. I know a lot of you are not incredibly pleased with the recent direction of the magazine. I'll do my best to address those concerns by making changes (some subtle, no doubt) to the magazine's editorial mix. For those of you considering dropping your subscriptions, I ask you to take a look at the cherished issues of past years and give us a little time to woo you back. For those of you who are pleased with the current direction of the magazine, especially fans of Polyhedron, stick with us. We've got a lot of incredible stuff planned for you. Lastly, I urge all interested readers to drop me an email at [email]polyhedron@paizo.com[/email] with suggestions on what you like or don't like about the magazine. What do you want to see in Dungeon? What are you tired of seeing in Dungeon? Drop me a line and I'll see what I can do. Thanks, Erik Mona Editor-in-Chief Dungeon/Polyhedron Magazine [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Dungeon Mag #101 - slight ranty.
Top