Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ThomasBJJ" data-source="post: 915406" data-attributes="member: 993">I very much like Dungeon #100. This also marks the first issue where I enjoyed the Polyhedron side. The reason being is that it supports the material in Dungeon. &nbsp;I buy Dungeon magazine (and Dragon magazine for that matter) for one purpose and one purpose only... DUNGEONS &amp; DRAGONS material for my game.&nbsp; Fiction, jokes, funny song lyrics, Scooby Doo mini-games, non-D&amp;D related comic strips, etc all detract from the &quot;focus&quot; of the magazines. (IMO).&nbsp;I do not enjoy Polyhedron (with the exception of the latest issue). If it could supplement material that could be used in a standard D&amp;D 3e game, then I would be a little happier. If it is not D&amp;D related, why is it in my D&amp;D magazine?&nbsp;That said, I'm a subscriber, and have been for a long time. (Both Dungeon and Dragon). If the only way to keep Dungeon in existance is to attach the Polyhedron stuff, then by all means keep it. I would prefer a 70% / 30% Dungeon to Polyhedron ratio in EVERY issue, with the more Dungeon the better. If the price went up a little bit, I wouldnt mind. If the magazine got a little bit smaller, I wouldnt mind. If it was mostly (or all) black and white, that would be ok too (hopefully it wont come to that).&nbsp;Whatever it takes to keep Dungeon around, I'm all for.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ThomasBJJ, post: 915406, member: 993"] I very much like Dungeon #100. This also marks the first issue where I enjoyed the Polyhedron side. The reason being is that it supports the material in Dungeon. I buy Dungeon magazine (and Dragon magazine for that matter) for one purpose and one purpose only... DUNGEONS & DRAGONS material for my game. Fiction, jokes, funny song lyrics, Scooby Doo mini-games, non-D&D related comic strips, etc all detract from the "focus" of the magazines. (IMO). I do not enjoy Polyhedron (with the exception of the latest issue). If it could supplement material that could be used in a standard D&D 3e game, then I would be a little happier. If it is not D&D related, why is it in my D&D magazine? That said, I'm a subscriber, and have been for a long time. (Both Dungeon and Dragon). If the only way to keep Dungeon in existance is to attach the Polyhedron stuff, then by all means keep it. I would prefer a 70% / 30% Dungeon to Polyhedron ratio in EVERY issue, with the more Dungeon the better. If the price went up a little bit, I wouldnt mind. If the magazine got a little bit smaller, I wouldnt mind. If it was mostly (or all) black and white, that would be ok too (hopefully it wont come to that). Whatever it takes to keep Dungeon around, I'm all for. [/QUOTE]

Verification