Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Arnwyn" data-source="post: 917340" data-attributes="member: 7701">Dump Poly. For me, that portion of the magazine is a huge waste of paper and ink. I'd like it dumped, and dumped fast. I have subscribed (for years) to Dungeon for Dungeon - if I wanted Poly, I would have bought Poly. (Also, as a note to the poll above - no feats, etc in Dungeon, please. That's not the place for it.)However, with that said, I'd like to draw attention to the post by ColonelHardisson, which I've quoted below:I think this is a pretty good idea, and think this is a good compromise. Actually, to be honest, I don't need Poly to be right out - just 70/30 *every* month in favor of Dungeon. I'm flexible. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />This I agree with as well. I've heard Paizo's response to this, and I still don't agree with it. I believe that, in regards to their reasoning, they're aiming at their target market inappropriately.With this crappy glossy paper of their's, I can no longer write notes in the margins, on maps, etc. This has severely decreased the utility of the magazine for me (and you know what, Paizo? I buy your magazine for the utility it provides me!).</blockquote>