Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Dungeon magazine says maybe more vile. Huzzah!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kenjib" data-source="post: 836168" data-attributes="member: 530"><p>On the mmadsen scale:</p><p></p><p># "Vile" material should be kept out of the core D&D books.</p><p># "Vile" material should be kept out of popular D&D supplements and magazines.</p><p></p><p>This move would move the magazine toward being unreadable by many younger fans of D&D just so fans of "mature" material can get extra boobs and gore. In addition, most parents wouldn't associate this kind of content with D&D (a game which in the public sphere has a strong reputation as being for kids) and might not know what their kid is reading. I think a second "Black Dragon" magazine would be a gread idea. They can make it quarterly and Avalanche Press can do the art direction. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>Looking back at my first experiences with D&D, I think it's kind of sad that some people want a market that is less inclusive of younger audiences. Yes, there is a distinct difference between levels of depiction -- a module where an act of depravity is suggested versus content where it is codified, described in graphic detail, and procedures provided for every aspect thereof. Even the nature of some of the specific acts really goes beyond the examples of mature themes in 1e (which I would argue really do show maturity in how they were handled -- i.e. included as a normal part of the adventure instead of highlighted and exaggerated for shock/shlock value).</p><p></p><p>And for the record I am far from conservative, so the stereotypes being bandied about do not apply. Myself, I just think that the vile content published so far shows clearly that WotC does not exhibit the level of sophistication required to print the type of mature material that would interest me. I think their coverage has been trite and frankly, juvenile in it's lack of exploration of the true issues at hand in favor of a simple cataloging of every imaginable depravity without almost no context. It is also exaggerated to the point of being comical, which is not my taste for such material. I think it exhibits a lack of good taste. I have nothing against it being published though, because it was done in a different context than Dragon/Dungeon, in which the pages are shared with more general use material.</p><p></p><p>I do think that the themes, handled appropriately, make good content for games though. It's all about presentation and context, which I have found sadly lacking so far. I think shadow's allusion to Beavis and Butthead is very apt.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kenjib, post: 836168, member: 530"] On the mmadsen scale: # "Vile" material should be kept out of the core D&D books. # "Vile" material should be kept out of popular D&D supplements and magazines. This move would move the magazine toward being unreadable by many younger fans of D&D just so fans of "mature" material can get extra boobs and gore. In addition, most parents wouldn't associate this kind of content with D&D (a game which in the public sphere has a strong reputation as being for kids) and might not know what their kid is reading. I think a second "Black Dragon" magazine would be a gread idea. They can make it quarterly and Avalanche Press can do the art direction. ;) Looking back at my first experiences with D&D, I think it's kind of sad that some people want a market that is less inclusive of younger audiences. Yes, there is a distinct difference between levels of depiction -- a module where an act of depravity is suggested versus content where it is codified, described in graphic detail, and procedures provided for every aspect thereof. Even the nature of some of the specific acts really goes beyond the examples of mature themes in 1e (which I would argue really do show maturity in how they were handled -- i.e. included as a normal part of the adventure instead of highlighted and exaggerated for shock/shlock value). And for the record I am far from conservative, so the stereotypes being bandied about do not apply. Myself, I just think that the vile content published so far shows clearly that WotC does not exhibit the level of sophistication required to print the type of mature material that would interest me. I think their coverage has been trite and frankly, juvenile in it's lack of exploration of the true issues at hand in favor of a simple cataloging of every imaginable depravity without almost no context. It is also exaggerated to the point of being comical, which is not my taste for such material. I think it exhibits a lack of good taste. I have nothing against it being published though, because it was done in a different context than Dragon/Dungeon, in which the pages are shared with more general use material. I do think that the themes, handled appropriately, make good content for games though. It's all about presentation and context, which I have found sadly lacking so far. I think shadow's allusion to Beavis and Butthead is very apt. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Dungeon magazine says maybe more vile. Huzzah!
Top