Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Dungeon magazine says maybe more vile. Huzzah!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Brown Jenkin" data-source="post: 840275" data-attributes="member: 2572"><p>I was first intoduced to the game at 9 and started playing regularly by 13. At 13 I never saw any of those movies (although I have now, many are great movies) nor subscribed to Heavy Metal or Epic, I had read the LotR but not Lovecraft. My parents wouldn't let me see such things at that age. They looked over the D&D stuff that I bought which was OD&D and were fine with it. If some of the "Vile" stuff had been included then I'm sure they would not have let me play. The point is everyone grew up with different standards and if the game had been "Vile" then there is a posibility I would not be playing today as I would have been forced to find other creative outlets. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>My first game was heroic fantansy of killing monsters not dark bakstabing, but everyone has thier own story.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It is not an either or situation. There is a wide scale of what parents find acceptable for children or not. Why not make the core products as friendly as possible to as many people on the scale. As I said I was a borderline case, and if D&D was more "Vile" at that time I might not be gaming. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The BoVD goes beyond what I find acceptable for children. Personally I would be fine if the Succubus was moved from the MM to the FF. One thing to note though is that in the Core books these ideas are not graphicaly described. Except for a couple of monsters in the MM there is nothing in the core books that is particularly "Vile" or "Mature" and even then it is not graphic. Sure killing is part of D&D but it is not graphic as it uses an abstract called HPs. Its not like Rolemaster with its descriptive critical charts. The concept of killing I don't think is a problem as even before video games kids played cowboys and indians. I think it is more a question of how graphic that depiction is in its effects on kids. The way I like to play D&D was/is always more cartoon vilonce rather than Hellraiser violence to me. This does not mean that I object to myself and others playing more graphicly if we choose, but that I don't want this forced upon me as part of the basic rules.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As I have said, I am not "sneering" at the BoVD or mature content. I have bought it and will continue to purchace mature products in the future. This does not mean that I can't object to it in core products or Dragon/Dungeon. I want to be able to introduce my children or nephews and neices to this game as soon as they are able to participate, not to have to wait until they are emotionaly ready to handle mature themes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Brown Jenkin, post: 840275, member: 2572"] I was first intoduced to the game at 9 and started playing regularly by 13. At 13 I never saw any of those movies (although I have now, many are great movies) nor subscribed to Heavy Metal or Epic, I had read the LotR but not Lovecraft. My parents wouldn't let me see such things at that age. They looked over the D&D stuff that I bought which was OD&D and were fine with it. If some of the "Vile" stuff had been included then I'm sure they would not have let me play. The point is everyone grew up with different standards and if the game had been "Vile" then there is a posibility I would not be playing today as I would have been forced to find other creative outlets. My first game was heroic fantansy of killing monsters not dark bakstabing, but everyone has thier own story. It is not an either or situation. There is a wide scale of what parents find acceptable for children or not. Why not make the core products as friendly as possible to as many people on the scale. As I said I was a borderline case, and if D&D was more "Vile" at that time I might not be gaming. The BoVD goes beyond what I find acceptable for children. Personally I would be fine if the Succubus was moved from the MM to the FF. One thing to note though is that in the Core books these ideas are not graphicaly described. Except for a couple of monsters in the MM there is nothing in the core books that is particularly "Vile" or "Mature" and even then it is not graphic. Sure killing is part of D&D but it is not graphic as it uses an abstract called HPs. Its not like Rolemaster with its descriptive critical charts. The concept of killing I don't think is a problem as even before video games kids played cowboys and indians. I think it is more a question of how graphic that depiction is in its effects on kids. The way I like to play D&D was/is always more cartoon vilonce rather than Hellraiser violence to me. This does not mean that I object to myself and others playing more graphicly if we choose, but that I don't want this forced upon me as part of the basic rules. As I have said, I am not "sneering" at the BoVD or mature content. I have bought it and will continue to purchace mature products in the future. This does not mean that I can't object to it in core products or Dragon/Dungeon. I want to be able to introduce my children or nephews and neices to this game as soon as they are able to participate, not to have to wait until they are emotionaly ready to handle mature themes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Dungeon magazine says maybe more vile. Huzzah!
Top