Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Dungeon World Gets New Owners, Second Edition Planned
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 9664028" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>Sure, but nothing they've shown so far suggests "revisiting" DW is at all the goal.</p><p></p><p></p><p>As [USER=7044099]@zakael19[/USER] says, that's not what it replicated. You're conflating the framing with the actual design and mechanics.</p><p></p><p>Without changing much else, you could change the framing, art, etc. and suddenly the game would have a drastically more modern feel. And you could also update the classes to more in-tune with very modern design but you wouldn't really have to do much. I mean, just look at Grimwild - which is extremely modern in all regards, and look at the class design. It's really not that different from DW's design.</p><p></p><p>But again, that doesn't seem to be the intention - the intention seems very much to be to create an entirely unrelated PtbA fantasy RPG, which just uses the brand name for recognition. This is something actually rarely seen outside of very cynical corporate stuff (though not never), and I'm not surprised they're getting some pushback because of it.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I'd love an explanation of how current DW wasn't like that/mechanically can't do that, because I've played DW extensively and without changing or modifying any rules, that's how it played out for us. Literally we were coming from 4E which was in many ways more like that description than 5E is (at least innately, given Pg. 42 and so on), and we found DW only made us do more stunt and "real epic fantasy stuff". The rules didn't in any way encourage gritty, 10ft pole dungeon crawling. Indeed they were pretty bad for that!</p><p></p><p>So I remain very skeptical here, because there's nothing to change but the presentation. I do agree with some critiques of Defy Danger, that's an area which could use a big rework, as could the specifics of some of the other moves, but fundamentally, there's nothing that prevented it being like that already.</p><p></p><p>I feel like I have to ask, did you ever actually play Dungeon World? I ask because you seem to have a very specific impression of it that's so at odds with how I found it to actually play, from literally the very first time I played it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 9664028, member: 18"] Sure, but nothing they've shown so far suggests "revisiting" DW is at all the goal. As [USER=7044099]@zakael19[/USER] says, that's not what it replicated. You're conflating the framing with the actual design and mechanics. Without changing much else, you could change the framing, art, etc. and suddenly the game would have a drastically more modern feel. And you could also update the classes to more in-tune with very modern design but you wouldn't really have to do much. I mean, just look at Grimwild - which is extremely modern in all regards, and look at the class design. It's really not that different from DW's design. But again, that doesn't seem to be the intention - the intention seems very much to be to create an entirely unrelated PtbA fantasy RPG, which just uses the brand name for recognition. This is something actually rarely seen outside of very cynical corporate stuff (though not never), and I'm not surprised they're getting some pushback because of it. I'd love an explanation of how current DW wasn't like that/mechanically can't do that, because I've played DW extensively and without changing or modifying any rules, that's how it played out for us. Literally we were coming from 4E which was in many ways more like that description than 5E is (at least innately, given Pg. 42 and so on), and we found DW only made us do more stunt and "real epic fantasy stuff". The rules didn't in any way encourage gritty, 10ft pole dungeon crawling. Indeed they were pretty bad for that! So I remain very skeptical here, because there's nothing to change but the presentation. I do agree with some critiques of Defy Danger, that's an area which could use a big rework, as could the specifics of some of the other moves, but fundamentally, there's nothing that prevented it being like that already. I feel like I have to ask, did you ever actually play Dungeon World? I ask because you seem to have a very specific impression of it that's so at odds with how I found it to actually play, from literally the very first time I played it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Dungeon World Gets New Owners, Second Edition Planned
Top