Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Manbearcat" data-source="post: 8252541" data-attributes="member: 6696971">Having Legend remain as a party total eases handling time/cognitive burden, so there is that. The way it could work with each characters Impending Doom Tracker is (a) first a Fortune roll is made to determine which PC's Impending Doom is online for this post-Adventure Entanglement, (b) Roll the PC's Entanglement.  This is orthodox Blades except for the extra step of (a) and (b) the Entanglement rolled for is not party-centric, but rather PC-centric.  For instance, take the exact Adventure I outlined above.  Go to post-Adventure Entanglements.(a)  Paladin comes up.(b)  The group is at Impending Doom 1 = 1d6.  The Legend is rolled over at 2 so roll on the first Paladin Impending Doom Table.  A 4 is rolled which results in:False Doctrine or Test of FaithLike orthodox Blades, the GM would pick one of two, frame a scene, and either a decision-point would be made by the Paladin PC (possibly with action resolution) and the scene would close, or the scene could be played out.This would ensure that every Entanglement would be thematically attached to a PC rather than the general approach of addressing the premise of the game at large.</blockquote>