Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Dungeons & Dragons 2024 Player's Handbook Is Already Getting Errata
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9461227" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>Okay, so we now have three different methods, because those would be a problem for other people who have, in this very conversation and thread, argued that those things would be problems.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So what did you mean by that statement then?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Why do you keep accusing me of having beef? I have repeatedly said I do not have beef with anyone, yet you keep accusing me of having beef. It is utterly bizarre.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>What do you mean? We had an entire conversation until they stopped responding. Or are you asking "why are you talking to me then" because that's easy. As part of my conversation with them, you got involved. If you are watching two people discussing in a hallway, you walk up and insert yourself in the conversation, it is really weird to start going "well why are you talking to me?" after one of the two walks away.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There is no beef. There is a prior context. Those two things are different.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm overreacting... and then you say the exact same thing I'm talking about. So I'm not overreacting, because sometimes this discussion about "the DM needs to have fun too, and my preferences make the game fun for me" lead to the game no longer existing. And if that is because the DM walked away, then I would call that the DM killing the game. </p><p></p><p>And frankly, if I used this conversation as a model for the discussion of preferences between the player and you... you seem utterly incapable of having that discussion in this instance. You have only said three things so far: 1) This is my preference 2) No, I didn't say that and you are making assumptions and 3) You are angry and have beef with someone else, why are you taking it out on me? </p><p></p><p>So, you state you preference. Your player says "okay, but that isn't my preference". Now what? What else do you say? You've done absolutely not a single thing in this discussion to make any case for anyone to change their behavior in any way. You obviously wouldn't just repeat to the player that you would prefer them to do something else. You seem like you would try and have a conversation. But I have no idea what the content of that conversation would even look like, because you have stated nothing beyond rhetorical moves against me for some imaginary emotions you think I am feeling. </p><p></p><p>So what is step two here?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 9461227, member: 6801228"] Okay, so we now have three different methods, because those would be a problem for other people who have, in this very conversation and thread, argued that those things would be problems. So what did you mean by that statement then? Why do you keep accusing me of having beef? I have repeatedly said I do not have beef with anyone, yet you keep accusing me of having beef. It is utterly bizarre. What do you mean? We had an entire conversation until they stopped responding. Or are you asking "why are you talking to me then" because that's easy. As part of my conversation with them, you got involved. If you are watching two people discussing in a hallway, you walk up and insert yourself in the conversation, it is really weird to start going "well why are you talking to me?" after one of the two walks away. There is no beef. There is a prior context. Those two things are different. I'm overreacting... and then you say the exact same thing I'm talking about. So I'm not overreacting, because sometimes this discussion about "the DM needs to have fun too, and my preferences make the game fun for me" lead to the game no longer existing. And if that is because the DM walked away, then I would call that the DM killing the game. And frankly, if I used this conversation as a model for the discussion of preferences between the player and you... you seem utterly incapable of having that discussion in this instance. You have only said three things so far: 1) This is my preference 2) No, I didn't say that and you are making assumptions and 3) You are angry and have beef with someone else, why are you taking it out on me? So, you state you preference. Your player says "okay, but that isn't my preference". Now what? What else do you say? You've done absolutely not a single thing in this discussion to make any case for anyone to change their behavior in any way. You obviously wouldn't just repeat to the player that you would prefer them to do something else. You seem like you would try and have a conversation. But I have no idea what the content of that conversation would even look like, because you have stated nothing beyond rhetorical moves against me for some imaginary emotions you think I am feeling. So what is step two here? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Dungeons & Dragons 2024 Player's Handbook Is Already Getting Errata
Top