Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="UngainlyTitan" data-source="post: 5765255" data-attributes="member: 28487">This I agree.Frankly I do not see the causation. I bough D&amp;D stuff in the 3e era because it was D&amp;D and I liked 3e (at least initially). Now from my personal prespective I also bought D20 games because they were D20 and so I felt that the learning curve would be light. But these games did not encourage me to buy any WoTC stuff. I bought a Paizo adventure path due to their reputation here. If I can ever persuade my gaming buddies onto a VTT I would run it in 4e. So while i have no problem seeing the advantages for punters like mwin the OGL I am not at all convinced that there is much advantage in it for WoTC.Now before someone brings up good adventrue support, a GLS that guaranteed that WoTC could not pull the licence from under them should be enough to encourage and adventure witing outfit, or am I missing something?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="UngainlyTitan, post: 5765255, member: 28487"] This I agree. Frankly I do not see the causation. I bough D&D stuff in the 3e era because it was D&D and I liked 3e (at least initially). Now from my personal prespective I also bought D20 games because they were D20 and so I felt that the learning curve would be light. But these games did not encourage me to buy any WoTC stuff. I bought a Paizo adventure path due to their reputation here. If I can ever persuade my gaming buddies onto a VTT I would run it in 4e. So while i have no problem seeing the advantages for punters like mwin the OGL I am not at all convinced that there is much advantage in it for WoTC. Now before someone brings up good adventrue support, a GLS that guaranteed that WoTC could not pull the licence from under them should be enough to encourage and adventure witing outfit, or am I missing something? [/QUOTE]

Verification