Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Beginning of the End" data-source="post: 5440243" data-attributes="member: 55271">Well... Unless you're talking about D&amp;D: Gamma World.Not to mention gnomes, half-orcs, and half-elves. (This ship sailed a long time ago.Not my experience. When people in my social circle say &quot;D&amp;D&quot; they can mean any number of things. The game they're least likely to mean (and most likely to refer by specific edition) is 4th Edition.Because that's the game none of those 30+ people (except 1) play.Similarly, when the topic of my D&amp;D games come up with non-gamers I'll never specify edition number. Why would I? Nevertheless, the games I'm referring to are (a) 1974 D&amp;D with no supplements and without Chainmail and (b) D&amp;D 3.5.Anyway, what concerns me is the way in which D&amp;D is directly responsible for the dilution of the CHAINMAIL brand name.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Beginning of the End, post: 5440243, member: 55271"] Well... Unless you're talking about D&D: Gamma World. Not to mention gnomes, half-orcs, and half-elves. (This ship sailed a long time ago. Not my experience. When people in my social circle say "D&D" they can mean any number of things. The game they're least likely to mean (and most likely to refer by specific edition) is 4th Edition. Because that's the game none of those 30+ people (except 1) play. Similarly, when the topic of my D&D games come up with non-gamers I'll never specify edition number. Why would I? Nevertheless, the games I'm referring to are (a) 1974 D&D with no supplements and without Chainmail and (b) D&D 3.5. Anyway, what concerns me is the way in which D&D is directly responsible for the dilution of the CHAINMAIL brand name. [/QUOTE]

Verification