Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Dungeons & Dragons Releases New Unearthed Arcana Subclasses, Strongly Hinting at Dark Sun
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Remathilis" data-source="post: 9737390" data-attributes="member: 7635"><p>Ok let's put it like this. </p><p></p><p>Imagine in a normal D&D world, a wizard in a 9 on the Arbitrary Power Scale (APS). It doesn't matter what alignment or moral outlook they have, they are always at about a 9. </p><p></p><p>A defiler is at a 10. He is getting extra power from defiling (even if its just a small boost) and is saddled with the hindrance: people don't like you. A hindrance you can get around with deception, intimidation, or because the DM isn't enforcing it as strictly as they should.</p><p></p><p>A Preserver is at a 7. He is arbitrarily weaker than a regular wizard and far below a defiler. The tradeoff is that people are less likely to not like you than they are the defiler. You are taken a 3 point hit in APS just by being a good person.</p><p></p><p>Does that seem fair? </p><p></p><p>The whole discussion came about because people were saying that this is acceptable, hell preferrable because being a good person SHOULD be harder, so by choosing to be good, you accept the 3 point drop in power as part of being good. And I asked why should that be acceptable? </p><p></p><p>and its really not. It was posted many pages back that preservers aren't actually a 7, they are a bog standard 9 and the defiler is, at best, a 9.5. That didn't stop people from saying they would prefer the defiler be a 9 and the preserver several points lower, hence the questioning on why should the good character be punished for being good, and the answer was "it fits the setting" so my next inquiry being "if good should be punished, doesn't that promote evil since it is not likewise punished?" and to that I got a lot of platitudes about doing the right thing. </p><p></p><p>I want to do the right thing; I don't want to be dropped points on the APS for choosing it. Not when the setting is already is harder than a normal D&D setting. </p><p></p><p>My ideal situation would be that that a defiler and a preserver are both a 9, but in different ways. Defilers get extra power, but at a real tangible cost. Preservers can avoid the cost but don't get the power. The same should be true of all PC options honestly. I don't agree that good characters should automatically be penalized mechanically for choosing the good option. </p><p></p><p>That's all I'm trying to get at.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Remathilis, post: 9737390, member: 7635"] Ok let's put it like this. Imagine in a normal D&D world, a wizard in a 9 on the Arbitrary Power Scale (APS). It doesn't matter what alignment or moral outlook they have, they are always at about a 9. A defiler is at a 10. He is getting extra power from defiling (even if its just a small boost) and is saddled with the hindrance: people don't like you. A hindrance you can get around with deception, intimidation, or because the DM isn't enforcing it as strictly as they should. A Preserver is at a 7. He is arbitrarily weaker than a regular wizard and far below a defiler. The tradeoff is that people are less likely to not like you than they are the defiler. You are taken a 3 point hit in APS just by being a good person. Does that seem fair? The whole discussion came about because people were saying that this is acceptable, hell preferrable because being a good person SHOULD be harder, so by choosing to be good, you accept the 3 point drop in power as part of being good. And I asked why should that be acceptable? and its really not. It was posted many pages back that preservers aren't actually a 7, they are a bog standard 9 and the defiler is, at best, a 9.5. That didn't stop people from saying they would prefer the defiler be a 9 and the preserver several points lower, hence the questioning on why should the good character be punished for being good, and the answer was "it fits the setting" so my next inquiry being "if good should be punished, doesn't that promote evil since it is not likewise punished?" and to that I got a lot of platitudes about doing the right thing. I want to do the right thing; I don't want to be dropped points on the APS for choosing it. Not when the setting is already is harder than a normal D&D setting. My ideal situation would be that that a defiler and a preserver are both a 9, but in different ways. Defilers get extra power, but at a real tangible cost. Preservers can avoid the cost but don't get the power. The same should be true of all PC options honestly. I don't agree that good characters should automatically be penalized mechanically for choosing the good option. That's all I'm trying to get at. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Dungeons & Dragons Releases New Unearthed Arcana Subclasses, Strongly Hinting at Dark Sun
Top