Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Dungeons & Dragons releases Villainous Options playtest
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Neonchameleon" data-source="post: 9891352" data-attributes="member: 87792"><p>Way to completely miss the point. The Death Knight is a character who falls from a code - but because you want all members of all classes to be cookie cutter you are scrubbing away the uniqueness of individuals and then declaring other options to be "blandification".</p><p></p><p>The example in question is of the monk - and stereotypically the monk is the most physically disciplined class in the game (Drunken Masters not withstanding). Does physical discipline often go with moral codification? Yes. So are paladins often physically disciplined and monks morally codified? Also yes. They are neighbours. And despite being not the same often have overlapping themes</p><p></p><p>Now is it likely that Conan the Barbarian would become a Death Knight? No. Not for probably most barbarians. But Ilmore the Zealot becoming a Death Knight? Sure; he's paladin adjacent anyway even if he can't lay on hands and has serious anger issues. Jaz the Orc Slayer giving up his life and soul to be able to kill more orcs? Again yes. Not all barbarians are cookie cutter clones of Conan despite your best efforts to scrub the detail and uniqueness out of the game. (I'd also argue Conan isn't part of the barbarian class in 5e but that's another story).</p><p></p><p>Your position is absurd as telling musicians that because notes are in the middle of the range of one instrument other instruments may not play it. In any piece of music. Now I get that going classless makes every instrument into a piano - but there is utterly no reason to mark a phrase of music "trumpets only" just because it is in the middle of the trumpet range. Especially if the trombone is also doing trombon-y glissandos that the trumpet simply can't do as part of the wider piece that the trumpet can't do and the trumpet is also going into its high register and using valve work the trombone can't. And I've nothing against the violin picking up the same musical phrase - which doesn't turn the violin into a trumpet. Now me? I like leitmotifs being shared between different instruments - and that doesn't somehow mysteriously make them the same instrument.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Neonchameleon, post: 9891352, member: 87792"] Way to completely miss the point. The Death Knight is a character who falls from a code - but because you want all members of all classes to be cookie cutter you are scrubbing away the uniqueness of individuals and then declaring other options to be "blandification". The example in question is of the monk - and stereotypically the monk is the most physically disciplined class in the game (Drunken Masters not withstanding). Does physical discipline often go with moral codification? Yes. So are paladins often physically disciplined and monks morally codified? Also yes. They are neighbours. And despite being not the same often have overlapping themes Now is it likely that Conan the Barbarian would become a Death Knight? No. Not for probably most barbarians. But Ilmore the Zealot becoming a Death Knight? Sure; he's paladin adjacent anyway even if he can't lay on hands and has serious anger issues. Jaz the Orc Slayer giving up his life and soul to be able to kill more orcs? Again yes. Not all barbarians are cookie cutter clones of Conan despite your best efforts to scrub the detail and uniqueness out of the game. (I'd also argue Conan isn't part of the barbarian class in 5e but that's another story). Your position is absurd as telling musicians that because notes are in the middle of the range of one instrument other instruments may not play it. In any piece of music. Now I get that going classless makes every instrument into a piano - but there is utterly no reason to mark a phrase of music "trumpets only" just because it is in the middle of the trumpet range. Especially if the trombone is also doing trombon-y glissandos that the trumpet simply can't do as part of the wider piece that the trumpet can't do and the trumpet is also going into its high register and using valve work the trombone can't. And I've nothing against the violin picking up the same musical phrase - which doesn't turn the violin into a trumpet. Now me? I like leitmotifs being shared between different instruments - and that doesn't somehow mysteriously make them the same instrument. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Dungeons & Dragons releases Villainous Options playtest
Top