Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Michael Morris" data-source="post: 770929" data-attributes="member: 87">The site's pretty explicit actually.  If it is not in the site's SRD, it's not open content.  Period.  No debating.  I do believe I have the most unambigious way of declaring open content possible.As far as not sharing NPC blocks, I wouldn't be the first publisher to do this sort of thing.  After all, many folks declare their open content on a per chapter basis and NPC stat blocks do appear elsewhere in many of those books.  The stat block format is open content - that isn't up for debate.  Their CONTENTS are not though.  They are descripting specific characters.  The more I think about it, the more I think this approach is safe.  The license simply calls for 10% of the materials to be open.  Nowhere did it say that anything that could be open content *should* become so.  It does provide for loss of PI if the open content isn't clearly labeld somehow, but again this is covered.Besides, who would want to copy one of my NPC's anyway??</blockquote>