Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="xelloss_ssj" data-source="post: 3337013" data-attributes="member: 49755">I play a duskblade ruled exactly this way and I believe it's not unbalanced at all, just a bit more interesting. Things like keen weapons or the improved critical feat makes critical feel al lot less exciting: but when rolling a 20 means 10d6 instead of 5d6 you put things back in the right perspective. And having a critical spell every twenty is not the kind of thing that could disrupt your game.If you really want to stick to the rules you should probably have spell not to have crits, but I can assure you that my 8th level duskblade, even allowing crits on channeled spells with a 20, had almost never achieved anything apart from being cool, you simply can't rely on rolling 20s. Just one time a hydra got owned by a critical on a large greatsword (6d6+16), with 6 point of damage from power attack, a 10d6 shocking grasp channeled and another 10d6 from yet another shocking grasp, thanks to the weapon spell storing ability: that was cool but in three month from then I didn't see it happen again...</blockquote>