Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="FinalSonicX" data-source="post: 5922259" data-attributes="member: 63787">Poison against dwarves is generally less effective than it would be against humans - whether or not the tactic is &quot;bad&quot; depends on the circumstances and the other competing tactics. And Dwarves do die from poison, I've seen some die.I agree +2 is terrible. Why not +10? Why not any other number? Do you really think a player would forget about a huge +10 bonus on their poison saves, especially with the way char sheets are shaping up?Give advantage to Dwarves on their poison saves and they only fail if both rolls are below the DC. Critical failure requires rolling two 1s. Do you think this is a bad solution?That's your assertion. I don't believe +x failed for 4 editions. I do believe it was too weak in 3.5, +2 is too small. But luckily since they're making a new edition, they can make that +x any number they want, or they can grant advantage.Can someone please explain to me why neither of my two proposed solutions are workable? All I hear is &quot;this is justifiable&quot; instead of &quot;This is the best way of accomplishing our goals&quot;.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="FinalSonicX, post: 5922259, member: 63787"] Poison against dwarves is generally less effective than it would be against humans - whether or not the tactic is "bad" depends on the circumstances and the other competing tactics. And Dwarves do die from poison, I've seen some die. I agree +2 is terrible. Why not +10? Why not any other number? Do you really think a player would forget about a huge +10 bonus on their poison saves, especially with the way char sheets are shaping up? Give advantage to Dwarves on their poison saves and they only fail if both rolls are below the DC. Critical failure requires rolling two 1s. Do you think this is a bad solution? That's your assertion. I don't believe +x failed for 4 editions. I do believe it was too weak in 3.5, +2 is too small. But luckily since they're making a new edition, they can make that +x any number they want, or they can grant advantage. Can someone please explain to me why neither of my two proposed solutions are workable? All I hear is "this is justifiable" instead of "This is the best way of accomplishing our goals". [/QUOTE]

Verification