Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="fireinthedust" data-source="post: 4803494" data-attributes="member: 51930">Drow:  yay no Drizzt!   Although, simply having a ranger with twf is fine, really, whatever the stats.    Also weird, however, drow in 4e don't really make good Clerics (the drow matrons) or Wizards.   In the books, drow could either be clerics (the women) or became warriors or Wizards (the men).       I think the Cha bonus should have been Int, to facilitate the wizards.  The clerics were always NPCs, so no reason to go that route.  Dwarves:   The hammers are for the mining, and the axes are because of their hatred of Trees: thus the Druid theory.  Seems to pan out.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />Tiefling Infernaloks:   Heh.  That is funny, although I thought some of their powers were Cha and others were Con, maybe some Int.  Mages and Warlords are also good, of course.Eladrin:  funny how they don't make good Feyloks.  I mean, they come from the Feywild, but they suck at making pacts with Feywild spirits?  Weird.   Granted, they kinda *ARE* the feywild patrons, when they get to high level, so that doesn't make too much sense.</blockquote>