Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RulesJD" data-source="post: 6831277" data-attributes="member: 6808367">Oh god, thank you for the humor.&nbsp; Needed that.1.&nbsp; Lol no.&nbsp; A 40 would barely even get you into a T20 school back in the day, definitely not today:&nbsp; <a href="http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2979&amp;context=dlj" target="_blank">http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2979&amp;context=dlj</a>A 40 is equivalent to the scores I quoted you (based on getting a 42 which is what you said, not a 45), not your fantastical listed 180 scale.&nbsp; I mean come on dude, it's getting to the point where I have to correct you on what you actually posted yourself, much less based on what I posted.&nbsp; A 42 out of 48 is equivalent of a 165/166, depending on your source and year you took the exam.&nbsp; See source above and here:&nbsp; <a href="http://isteve.blogspot.com/2013/05/obamas-lsat-score.html?_sm_au_=iVVLSVskbMNNHF6k" target="_blank">http://isteve.blogspot.com/2013/05/obamas-lsat-score.html?_sm_au_=iVVLSVskbMNNHF6k</a>Under absolutely no circumstances was the test harder.&nbsp; Want to know what kids today do to de-stress from LSAT prep?&nbsp; They take the older exams.&nbsp; Not even joking, that's even what the test prep companies tell them to do.&nbsp; Whenever you feel like actually responding to my points by the way (which I put in a nice list format to help you keep track of them since reading comp isn't your forte clearly) I'd be glad to respond in kind, rather than contributing to your continued degradation of the public's opinion of the legal profession.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RulesJD, post: 6831277, member: 6808367"] Oh god, thank you for the humor. Needed that. 1. Lol no. A 40 would barely even get you into a T20 school back in the day, definitely not today: [url]http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2979&context=dlj[/url] A 40 is equivalent to the scores I quoted you (based on getting a 42 which is what you said, not a 45), not your fantastical listed 180 scale. I mean come on dude, it's getting to the point where I have to correct you on what you actually posted yourself, much less based on what I posted. A 42 out of 48 is equivalent of a 165/166, depending on your source and year you took the exam. See source above and here: [url]http://isteve.blogspot.com/2013/05/obamas-lsat-score.html?_sm_au_=iVVLSVskbMNNHF6k[/url] Under absolutely no circumstances was the test harder. Want to know what kids today do to de-stress from LSAT prep? They take the older exams. Not even joking, that's even what the test prep companies tell them to do. Whenever you feel like actually responding to my points by the way (which I put in a nice list format to help you keep track of them since reading comp isn't your forte clearly) I'd be glad to respond in kind, rather than contributing to your continued degradation of the public's opinion of the legal profession. [/QUOTE]

Verification