Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
E6 Question (well really E10)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Scurvy_Platypus" data-source="post: 4530142" data-attributes="member: 43283"><p>I ran an E8 game for about a year.</p><p></p><p>I wouldn't bother changing the cost.</p><p></p><p>d20/D&D is based around something like 13 encounters and then you level. In theory, you hit level 20 after a year of playing a weekly game. I'm hazy on the specifics, but I'm sure there's plenty of people around that can give you the exact numbers if you want.</p><p></p><p>In giving out Feats, you're not significantly increasing the overall power of what a character can do; instead you're increasing the number of things they can do. Usually. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> Having more options to resolve stuff (combat or non-combat) does increase the "power" of the character, but not the same way that a level bump of Saves, Hit Points, Ability Increases, and Class Abilities does.</p><p></p><p>People like to see change to their characters, and putting down a single feat every 5k really isn't a "change" for most people. Especially since many feats are "exception" based; meaning that they allow you to avoid being hit by a rule you were previously subject to. Like penalties for this or that attack, or Attacks of Opportunity, and so on.</p><p></p><p>Which means that while a character does gain some power, the feeling/perception of the _player_ is that not much has actually changed.</p><p></p><p>Also, Upper_Krust did some work regarding what various things like special abilities, Hit Dice, Feats, and so on were worth in terms of CR. As I recall (I don't have the document handy) and Feat is considered to be worth .2 CR. Yeah yeah, it doesn't take into account the deliberately designed-to-suck feats. It's still a good rule of thumb for the GM to take into consideration.</p><p></p><p>In other words, if you're worried about characters gaining "too much power" too quickly, I don't think it's going to be too much of an issue. Every 5 feats (25k of experience) consider the character to be roughly another level higher.</p><p></p><p>Obviously you have to be careful here. The overall CR system isn't fool-proof and using this rule of thumb isn't either. You want to make sure the monsters/NPCs are all following the same rules too. You shouldn't just toss in new higher CR monsters, just because the PCs now have more feats. Those higher CR monsters have additional stuff that's been packaged along with them that makes it a bit unfair.</p><p></p><p>The thing you're going to have to keep an eye out for is the... glass ninja?... thing. After a while, you'll wind up with characters that are _very_ competent, and can potentially deal some pretty serious smackdown in combat. But their overall ability to absorb punishment hasn't actually increased significantly. They can simply dish out more damage or have additional ways to resolve problems. If you simply increase the combat difficulty by using higher CR stuff, you run the risk of a cascade effect which can result in a TPK. Instead, you're better off increasing the number of opponents faced, or bumping up the toughness of some critters.</p><p></p><p>And of course, you need to do something other than combat.</p><p></p><p>Combat is the primary form of XP in d20/D&D, and chasing XP is the way that character power increases. However, running an E6/E8/E* game means you're _capping_ the overall power increase. Which means there's less incentive for players to chase the XP, since their characters will hit that cap; I've never played in a game that's managed to go from 1-20 in my 20 years of play, but getting up to 6th or 8th level? Plenty.</p><p></p><p>Since hitting the cap is going to be a very real and present thing for the players, you need to make sure they've got other stuff to do than just fight.</p><p></p><p>Think of it like this: Most people are into chasing the 1-20, zero to hero, only you can save the world kind of play. It's like a movie like Lord of the Rings or some crap like that. You start out running from rats, and eventually you're a superhero slaying gods and demons.</p><p></p><p>An E* game on the other hand is much more like a TV series. You've got characters that can do X. As the series goes on, sometimes they can do/learn some more stuff, but on the whole you've got a pretty good idea who and what they are.</p><p></p><p>I would personally suggest taking the cues for your game more from "Alias" than "Lord of the Rings". You can _do_ gritty combat and no magic (at least that's what a lot of people seem to be after with E6/E8 games), still have it be "heroic fantasy" (or whatever), and still be more "Alias" (TV series) than long movie.</p><p></p><p>A TV series tends to focus in on a relatively limited "base area" that the characters operate within, and then they deal with stuff. "Stuff" being: each other, random antagonists that show up, support characters (NPCs) and their relationship with the main Protagonists (PCs) and how that's affected by whatever it is the Protagonists are engaged in doing, and so on. Buffy, Angel, Alias, Lost, Dresden Files... all of 'em have some similarities in regards to this sort of thing. And not just those shows, but even something like House M.D. or Dead Like Me.</p><p></p><p>Running an E* game is a pretty simple thing on its surface. But there's a lot of subtle stuff going on in the background. From the GM perspective it starts off being "I want to run a low magic and gritty game" or more rarely "I don't feel like dealing with the pointless inflation" (my reason), but when you're taking away the player's toys like that, you need to think about what it leaves for the players to play with.</p><p></p><p>Keep the progression rate as it is, or make your life even simpler and just decide that roughly every 5 sessions, characters will have done enough to justify getting another Feat. It'll be a little bit of a feeding of the "improve the character" thing that most gamers are addicted to, and allow you to focus your game on more than just the XP/Level grind.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Scurvy_Platypus, post: 4530142, member: 43283"] I ran an E8 game for about a year. I wouldn't bother changing the cost. d20/D&D is based around something like 13 encounters and then you level. In theory, you hit level 20 after a year of playing a weekly game. I'm hazy on the specifics, but I'm sure there's plenty of people around that can give you the exact numbers if you want. In giving out Feats, you're not significantly increasing the overall power of what a character can do; instead you're increasing the number of things they can do. Usually. :) Having more options to resolve stuff (combat or non-combat) does increase the "power" of the character, but not the same way that a level bump of Saves, Hit Points, Ability Increases, and Class Abilities does. People like to see change to their characters, and putting down a single feat every 5k really isn't a "change" for most people. Especially since many feats are "exception" based; meaning that they allow you to avoid being hit by a rule you were previously subject to. Like penalties for this or that attack, or Attacks of Opportunity, and so on. Which means that while a character does gain some power, the feeling/perception of the _player_ is that not much has actually changed. Also, Upper_Krust did some work regarding what various things like special abilities, Hit Dice, Feats, and so on were worth in terms of CR. As I recall (I don't have the document handy) and Feat is considered to be worth .2 CR. Yeah yeah, it doesn't take into account the deliberately designed-to-suck feats. It's still a good rule of thumb for the GM to take into consideration. In other words, if you're worried about characters gaining "too much power" too quickly, I don't think it's going to be too much of an issue. Every 5 feats (25k of experience) consider the character to be roughly another level higher. Obviously you have to be careful here. The overall CR system isn't fool-proof and using this rule of thumb isn't either. You want to make sure the monsters/NPCs are all following the same rules too. You shouldn't just toss in new higher CR monsters, just because the PCs now have more feats. Those higher CR monsters have additional stuff that's been packaged along with them that makes it a bit unfair. The thing you're going to have to keep an eye out for is the... glass ninja?... thing. After a while, you'll wind up with characters that are _very_ competent, and can potentially deal some pretty serious smackdown in combat. But their overall ability to absorb punishment hasn't actually increased significantly. They can simply dish out more damage or have additional ways to resolve problems. If you simply increase the combat difficulty by using higher CR stuff, you run the risk of a cascade effect which can result in a TPK. Instead, you're better off increasing the number of opponents faced, or bumping up the toughness of some critters. And of course, you need to do something other than combat. Combat is the primary form of XP in d20/D&D, and chasing XP is the way that character power increases. However, running an E6/E8/E* game means you're _capping_ the overall power increase. Which means there's less incentive for players to chase the XP, since their characters will hit that cap; I've never played in a game that's managed to go from 1-20 in my 20 years of play, but getting up to 6th or 8th level? Plenty. Since hitting the cap is going to be a very real and present thing for the players, you need to make sure they've got other stuff to do than just fight. Think of it like this: Most people are into chasing the 1-20, zero to hero, only you can save the world kind of play. It's like a movie like Lord of the Rings or some crap like that. You start out running from rats, and eventually you're a superhero slaying gods and demons. An E* game on the other hand is much more like a TV series. You've got characters that can do X. As the series goes on, sometimes they can do/learn some more stuff, but on the whole you've got a pretty good idea who and what they are. I would personally suggest taking the cues for your game more from "Alias" than "Lord of the Rings". You can _do_ gritty combat and no magic (at least that's what a lot of people seem to be after with E6/E8 games), still have it be "heroic fantasy" (or whatever), and still be more "Alias" (TV series) than long movie. A TV series tends to focus in on a relatively limited "base area" that the characters operate within, and then they deal with stuff. "Stuff" being: each other, random antagonists that show up, support characters (NPCs) and their relationship with the main Protagonists (PCs) and how that's affected by whatever it is the Protagonists are engaged in doing, and so on. Buffy, Angel, Alias, Lost, Dresden Files... all of 'em have some similarities in regards to this sort of thing. And not just those shows, but even something like House M.D. or Dead Like Me. Running an E* game is a pretty simple thing on its surface. But there's a lot of subtle stuff going on in the background. From the GM perspective it starts off being "I want to run a low magic and gritty game" or more rarely "I don't feel like dealing with the pointless inflation" (my reason), but when you're taking away the player's toys like that, you need to think about what it leaves for the players to play with. Keep the progression rate as it is, or make your life even simpler and just decide that roughly every 5 sessions, characters will have done enough to justify getting another Feat. It'll be a little bit of a feeding of the "improve the character" thing that most gamers are addicted to, and allow you to focus your game on more than just the XP/Level grind. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
E6 Question (well really E10)
Top