Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="argo" data-source="post: 2139948" data-attributes="member: 5752">Yeah I know, but Spell Focus is what got the press as being the culprit.&nbsp; And I agree that the DC boosters needed to be taken out back of the woodshed, no complaints there, but it was laid on prety thick.&nbsp; Spell Focus went from being a feat that a majority of wizards took at least once for their favorite school to a feat almost nobody takes except to meet Prc requirements, its in the same league as Dodge now where before it was hanging out with Weapon Focus.Bah, gonna stop hijacking this thread right now.Hmmm, I've never seen it that way.&nbsp; All the weapons with multipliers higher than x2 threaten on a 20, which means the highest you can stack the threat range up is 18-20.&nbsp; Thats good but it lacks the consistency of 12-20 which is what really seems to freak out most of the people who are opposed to the stacking.&nbsp; The logic being that many things you fight you need to roll about a 12 or so to hit in the first place so a person with a 12-20 threat range will either miss outright or threaten a crit nearly every time.&nbsp; Or at least that is the fear.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="argo, post: 2139948, member: 5752"] Yeah I know, but Spell Focus is what got the press as being the culprit. And I agree that the DC boosters needed to be taken out back of the woodshed, no complaints there, but it was laid on prety thick. Spell Focus went from being a feat that a majority of wizards took at least once for their favorite school to a feat almost nobody takes except to meet Prc requirements, its in the same league as Dodge now where before it was hanging out with Weapon Focus. Bah, gonna stop hijacking this thread right now. Hmmm, I've never seen it that way. All the weapons with multipliers higher than x2 threaten on a 20, which means the highest you can stack the threat range up is 18-20. Thats good but it lacks the consistency of 12-20 which is what really seems to freak out most of the people who are opposed to the stacking. The logic being that many things you fight you need to roll about a 12 or so to hit in the first place so a person with a 12-20 threat range will either miss outright or threaten a crit nearly every time. Or at least that is the fear. [/QUOTE]

Verification