Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jester David" data-source="post: 6174994" data-attributes="member: 37579">As I've said elsewhere, if TSR had never reprinted their "Convention Exclusives" we wouldn't have the A-series (Slavers), Hidden Shrine of Tamoachan, Ghost Tower of Inverness, Tomb of Horrors, and the Giants series. (And likely a couple more.)I don't mind the idea of convention exclusive products. Paizo does this well with buttons, alternate covers, repainted minis, and fun things like goblin masks. I'd love to have the minis and mask but it's not going to impact my game one way or another. Beta tests of rules are also fine. The market for untested products is small and having "the first product" is a nice perk. But it's not going to be a hole in your collection if you don't have the alternate rules.However, I don't like missing content. Which is half of this product. I dislike missing out on an adventure. And I can only imagine how Realms fans feel losing this piece of world lore and a bit of the Sundering. I imagine that's what irks people the most. Yet another adventure that will be forgotten in a couple years, another piece of the game's heritage that will survive for a short time via eBay before becoming the domain of pirates. In many ways, that's the legacy of WotC's 4e adventures: badly scanned copies being torrented around.</blockquote>