Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="MechaTarrasque" data-source="post: 7072341" data-attributes="member: 6801226">UA's are not there to give us new toys, but to see what we think about potential new toys, so if you didn't like it, and filled out the survey within a month of the UA article, that is good (it is what they wanted to know).  If not, you are out of luck.  A lot of people (including me) are hoping the much speculated "major mechanical expansion" will include more on other settings.  If so, that will be the "official" versions.The idea that they were ever going to clone the 3.5 rules into 5e is ridiculous.  Why 3.5 instead of 1e? 2e?  4e? 3e for that matter? If Eberron is officially supported by 5e, it will be done with 5e rules (and maybe a couple of special rules just for Eberron).I don't recall the Curse of Strahd AP having restrictions on how the villagers felt about any "exotic" races, and I am almost positive there were no penalties like you describe.  Honestly, 5e is a return to DM empowerment, so this kind of thing seems like it is unlikely.  If a DM wants it to happen, it happens (probably disadvantage on persuasion checks), if not, it doesn't.</blockquote>