Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Henry" data-source="post: 1323592" data-attributes="member: 158">The implication that someone that experienced has effectively lost her childhood, I would imagine. Whether by divine manifestation or not, a 9-year old who is 16th level, is no longer a child. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown    :("  data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" />Keith, thanks for the glimpses and the helping us try and see the big picture behind the veil. I'm all for the setting, even though I may never see it used for quite some time. The concept of the "1930's pulp genre" feel to the setting is a great one - one that in my opinion WotC has SUCKED at conveying thus far (no offense to Bill or Rich - but it's taken you hammering the point multiple times to get it across, and the slideshow did not convey what its creator set out to convey).I may be operating in misconceptionville, but I think I "get" the setting, and I'm excited about the idea of it. But I have the prediction that, moreso than any other setting, this one will have a lot of people who dislike it now will grow to love it, and a lot of people who like what they "think" the concept is will grow to dislike it - I have the feeling we will see a 180 degree audience flop in many instances. Hopefully, if it happens, the numbers will be favorable.Keep writing, Keith! I'll keep my fingers crossed and money in hand. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />BTW, Keith, if you get to answer this: have the main writing chores on the core book been finished, to your knowledge?</blockquote>

Verification