Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Seravin" data-source="post: 1744789" data-attributes="member: 6783">Expanding a bit on my previous post and actually addressing your question directly:  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> My gut DM instinct would be to say no, and not let psionic powers be placed into potions/scrolls/wands.  That's what the tattos/power stones/dorjes are for.  For me it's a flavor thing though, and psionic powers can only be properly held in crystal-thingies.Power-wise, I doubt it is that unbalancing as there are spells that replicate almost every psionic power and the artificer can replicate them all.  Two things to consider though:1. Does the artificer have the Use Psionic Device skill to replicate the psionic power?  I think this would be required - even in transparency mode I think UPD is still different from UMD.2. None of the artificer's meta-magic feats will apply to replicated psionic powers (no heightened wands for example).Just my 2 cents though.  My artificer is a halfling tailor and is only just beginning to explore the magic outside of cloth-based items.   <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification