Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="The Shaman" data-source="post: 2929792" data-attributes="member: 26473">I was replying to Hussar's hazy and incomplete recollection of 1e - subdued dragons were not "pets."Hussar tends to make frequent claims about 1e that, while accurate representations of his personal experience, are pretty far removed from the actual rules of the game. Apparently gamers who played AD&D without knowing very much about what was in the rule books were pretty common - there was a funny post about this not too long ago, though I admit I couldn't really relate to the poster's experience directly, since we did use the rules in our games. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> You're really confused and completely missed the point. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> I have no problem with monsters as player characters, if the game master is comfortable with that - my original point is that player characters should fit the setting, that's all. Asrom claims that it's the game master's "job" to allow any character concept, and I disagreed.Better now? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification